royanee
10-04-2006, 01:51 AM
Not in a happy way either. So, I finish up my range. Feeling all spiffy. Reserve a new range, a good chunk. Been running proth_sieve_sse2 because it's faster in my personal testing (there's a post on here somewhere that shows it, though that may have been an older version).
ANYWAY, proth_sieve is unhappy with the new start and end numbers. Complains about some silly boundary. Ok, alright, I'll join this century and *try* out the newer client (with it's Windows only binary).
...
...
Hmm, maybe WINE (WINE Is Not an Emulator) doesn't like the SSE2 version. So I try all the other versions...
...
...
Nothing. No output, no reaction at all.
/me sheds tears of sadness.
If you took the time to read this, you have time to make a Linux binary. I don't care if you statically link or not, hehe. I just want something that works. And it's not like I'm running libc.so.5, Debian sid (it's stable enough) ftw.
:bouncy:
ANYWAY, proth_sieve is unhappy with the new start and end numbers. Complains about some silly boundary. Ok, alright, I'll join this century and *try* out the newer client (with it's Windows only binary).
...
...
Hmm, maybe WINE (WINE Is Not an Emulator) doesn't like the SSE2 version. So I try all the other versions...
...
...
Nothing. No output, no reaction at all.
/me sheds tears of sadness.
If you took the time to read this, you have time to make a Linux binary. I don't care if you statically link or not, hehe. I just want something that works. And it's not like I'm running libc.so.5, Debian sid (it's stable enough) ftw.
:bouncy: