View Full Version : Improving stats view
Death
01-23-2004, 03:51 AM
http://www.aooq73.dsl.pipex.com/scores.htm
User scores
Ranges complete/reserved
Pos UserName Score ( %) FacU ( %) FacD n<3M 3M<n<20M n>20M Excluded n<3M 3M<n<20M
1 MikeH 2259527.07+(19.36) 47045+(12.30) 3161 26574+ 20471+ 0 2735 34965 29880/39065
2 OrkunBanuTST (Nuri) 1352136.03+(11.59) 19891 ( 5.20) 1599 3247 16644 0 3866 7500 21000/25000
3 Mystwalker 1228445.24+(10.53) 6944+( 1.82) 591 636+ 6308+ 0 189 18627 14627/21227
I wish that the even or odd lines have some gray backgound. The table will be much more readable...
MikeH
01-24-2004, 03:55 AM
Something like that (http://www.aooq73.dsl.pipex.com/scores.htm) ?
pixl97
01-24-2004, 04:14 AM
Thats great MikeH, the scores are much more readable now.
Heres a graphical view of the gaps between 100T and 400T I conjoured up.
http://pixl.goquest.com/sb/seive100T-400T.jpg
Death
01-27-2004, 09:13 AM
well, now it looks very well.
thanks.
It looks much nicer now. Thanks for the idea and implementation.
Death
02-13-2004, 07:23 AM
well got a question
how long it take to personal stats updating.
http://www.aooq73.dsl.pipex.com/ui/3419.htm
at bottom
Reserved ranges
Incomplete
171000 - 171500 must be in complete
and also 500000-500015 was completed yesterday
is this changed manually or automatically?
MikeH
02-13-2004, 09:44 AM
is this changed manually or automatically? It's manual. I update them at least once a week, but not as often as every day.
Death
02-13-2004, 09:55 AM
Originally posted by MikeH
It's manual. I update them at least once a week, but not as often as every day.
got it.
btw, are you from GB?
MikeH
02-13-2004, 11:21 AM
btw, are you from GB? Yep. I'm about 30 miles west of London.
Death
02-13-2004, 12:18 PM
Originally posted by MikeH
Yep. I'm about 30 miles west of London.
just wondering why dont you sleep at 6 at the morning =)))
seems that's everybody is sleeping so nobody at forum....
Death
02-20-2004, 03:50 AM
Daily change last 1 day : -0.00
why minus?
MikeH
02-20-2004, 02:34 PM
This problem can be summed up in two words "rounding errors".
Basically, the scores for each unique factor are stored (but to a limited number of decimal places). On each stats run those scores are recalculated. The new result always has better precision than the stored result, so there will always be a small error, which can be positive or negative.
I guess I could fix it, but somehow it feels "quaint".
Death
02-23-2004, 03:17 AM
Originally posted by MikeH
This problem can be summed up in two words "rounding errors".
Basically, the scores for each unique factor are stored (but to a limited number of decimal places). On each stats run those scores are recalculated. The new result always has better precision than the stored result, so there will always be a small error, which can be positive or negative.
I guess I could fix it, but somehow it feels "quaint".
Definitions of quaint on the Web:
strange in an interesting or pleasing way; "quaint dialect words"; "quaint streets of New Orleans, that most foreign of American cities"
www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn
very strange or unusual; odd or even incongruous in character or appearance; "the head terminating in the quaint duck bill which gives the animal its vernacular name"- Bill Beatty; "came forth a quaint and fearful sight"- Sir Walter Scott; "a quaint sense of humor"
www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn
attractively old-fashioned (but not necessarily authentic); "houses with quaint thatched roofs"; "a vaulted roof supporting old-time chimney pots"
www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn
curiously beautiful
www.shakespeare.sk/Glossary/Glossary_Q.html
dròl
www.haitiwebs.com/cook2/glossary/index.php
me 2 =)))))))))))))
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.