Scoofy12
06-23-2005, 01:04 AM
At last, thanks to LAURENU2's generosity, after some delay (thanks to an RMA and my schedule), my new give-a-way cruncher has been assembled. I picked up an MSI K7N2 Delta (nForce2), and with it an XP2800 and put it together with the rest of the new gear. So the new cruncher is now running FAD with a rating of 193. So victory has been declared there. Plus with this new infusion of parts, I've probably got enough to build another cruncher soon.
w00t!
Now the question.
So now I'm left with a spare Sempron 2400. I thought I might use it as an upgrade for my current XP2100. The current thought on whether this is feasible is "maybe". The problem is that the CPU is designed for a 166 MHz FSB, but the board (an Epox 8KHA with via KT266 chipset) is designed for 133 or 100 FSB and RAM (and my ram is only PC2100 or DDR266). Fortunately the board is very tweakable, and supports running the RAM and FSB asynchronously (at a 1.33/1 ratio) and setting the FSB arbitrarily. so i've cranked the FSB now up to 150 and the RAM is at about 112, putting the CPU at about 1500MHz.
so if you've waded through that, 2 questions:
1). I ran the FSB up to almost 166 doing this and the MB booted, but the USB mouse didn't work when i did this. does running the FSB up like this also increase the AGP/PCI/other peripheral bus speeds as well?
2) assuming i can get the bus up to nearly 166, which would be better: the XP2100 at 1733MHz with a 133MHz bus and 133MHz RAM, or the Sempron 2400 at 1660MHz with a 166MHz bus and 125MHz ram? I can find this out probably by testing with FAD, but opinions are welcome.
also note that unlocking the multiplier by making the CPU appear as a mobile is probably out since the chipset is too old.
opinions?
w00t!
Now the question.
So now I'm left with a spare Sempron 2400. I thought I might use it as an upgrade for my current XP2100. The current thought on whether this is feasible is "maybe". The problem is that the CPU is designed for a 166 MHz FSB, but the board (an Epox 8KHA with via KT266 chipset) is designed for 133 or 100 FSB and RAM (and my ram is only PC2100 or DDR266). Fortunately the board is very tweakable, and supports running the RAM and FSB asynchronously (at a 1.33/1 ratio) and setting the FSB arbitrarily. so i've cranked the FSB now up to 150 and the RAM is at about 112, putting the CPU at about 1500MHz.
so if you've waded through that, 2 questions:
1). I ran the FSB up to almost 166 doing this and the MB booted, but the USB mouse didn't work when i did this. does running the FSB up like this also increase the AGP/PCI/other peripheral bus speeds as well?
2) assuming i can get the bus up to nearly 166, which would be better: the XP2100 at 1733MHz with a 133MHz bus and 133MHz RAM, or the Sempron 2400 at 1660MHz with a 166MHz bus and 125MHz ram? I can find this out probably by testing with FAD, but opinions are welcome.
also note that unlocking the multiplier by making the CPU appear as a mobile is probably out since the chipset is too old.
opinions?