Systematic Misrepresentation is....
..a euphemism for LYING.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0108/d...te.html?s=entt
Given the balance of power in the Senate and Congress right now it wont be investigated like it should...just look at the Palme investigation for proof.
I wonder if theyll claim Executive Privelage like they did with Dicks `Energy Commission` ;)
Enjoy America! You got the Gubt you wanted! :cheers:
...and another thought.....
AFGHANISTAN
The justification for the invasion of Afghanistan is perfectly clear. The Taliban did provide sanctuary for Al-Quaeda for years. The Taliban did refuse to turn over Osama bin Laden & Co. after the attacks of September 11th, 2001. Mullah Omar and friends did encourage bin Laden to plan and carry out attacks on US embassies and naval vessels. Those people were and continue to be a "clear and present danger" to citizens of the United States.
There have been some positive effects from the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.
Item: Libya (Quadaffi, specifically) has requested international inspection to verify that Libya has no WMDs.
Item: Iran is in the process of accepting inspection of their nuclear plant.
Item: Pakistan is actively chasing/catching Taliban and Al-Quaeda people in the North of Pakistan. Musharref has evidently decided that the Taliban/Al-Quaeda combo is a threat to him, personally, as well as to Pakistan as a whole. I suspect (but have no evidence whatsoever) that Musharref took a good look at what happened to Iraq in 1990, and decided that post- 9/11 was not a good time to get stroppy.
EUROPE AND OUR ALLIES
On the debit side, France and Germany are mightily irritated with the US. Since these are the major players in Western Europe, we do have to listen to them.
On the plus side, we do know who has a realistic view of the terrorist world. Poland and Spain, in particular, have been very supportive.
I'm saving Great Britain for last for a reason. The British troops in Iraq have been with the US on the ground from Day One. PM Tony Blair has put his political life in great jeapordy by taking a position that is extremely unpopular with the general population of Great Britain. He will, in fact, probably be forced from office, and fade into political obscurity. The only reason I can see for him doing this is moral conviction that this is, indeed, the Right Thing to do.
These are just some of my thoughts. Anyone else?
Blair wouldn't kno a moral decision if it hit
him right between his ferrety eyes.
As Chinasaur says all politicians lie sooner or later, some are good at it and get away with it some are bad and get caught.
All of this is very Jerry McGuire, they are all baying Show me the money.
Fat Cats with fingers in everyone elses pockets feuling their greedy ambition.
Altruism and moral codes are left at the door like a wet raincoat when you join office.
Power corrupts and absolute power (which Bushy thinks he has) corrupts absolutely.
All countries should have referrenda before committing the lives of their troops to war.
We were all hoodwinked and lied to at every single step of the way.
We forget, or just don't know that the people we are supposed to fight were the ones that the secret services had funded to fight dirty wars against other coutries we didn't like at the time.
Al Quaeda might as well be part of the CIA, who knows the pay department are probably still sending the pay packets out.