Search:

The long awaited description of my gumpy ol' computer.

Yes, it is an Intel Motherboard of '96ish vintage with a real Pentium 133 chip. Due to capacitance leakage and such, the motherboard is...

Yes, your figures are about right. The cranky ol' rig just plain locks up randomly, regardless of what is running on it. So I lose completed units every time.

So I have it set to 1000, and...

All your DF structures are belong to us.

RuneStar½ is a PBBer. Check us out.

Dan

I like runestar½'s first idea. Create and use a more foolproof batch file.

More goofproof is a good move.

Dan

While not technical, not scientific, but promotional in nature, it would be great if there was a Team Information Topic section here at the Free-DC Forum.

The idea is that teams can POUND THEIR...

tpdooley

The point is that I can! Yes, with a Pentium classic and 32 MB RAM, I CAN run DF and s@h command line clients at the same time.

But even if I run DF by itself, having an auto upload...

but work was indeed lost since the dead client had no way to check in. This is another reason why I suggested that we be permitted to set the checkin minimum lower; so data loss would be minimized.

RS½

Yes, with 32 MB RAM on my cranky old P133; Win98SE and 640X480 monitor, I am running S@H and DF; both Command Line Versions. I have not fiddled with switches to optimize DF, so it cranks out...

Of course, the malicious user can POUND OUT 10000, just as easily as 100, but I am not issuing a challenge. While waiting for the minimum to be set to 100, I will simply close and re-open my cranky...

Thanks for the ditto! :D

Putting the cranky old computer to work is for the FUN of it. I've got powerful computers contributing.

Hey, let's try to save room in the dump for something good. If you want to be an...

I have a few really old computers that I can put to use for DF. These are Pentium classics. While DF runs, setting the check in flag to 1000 units means that it checks in very slowly. A power...