I was running the client on several AMD machines and found the new version (1.2.0) was better. I believe the problems it had with serveral processors was in the clients failure to run processor...
Type: Posts; User: Keroberts1
I was running the client on several AMD machines and found the new version (1.2.0) was better. I believe the problems it had with serveral processors was in the clients failure to run processor...
Could a method of incorporating double checking into the main effort be coupled with this new release? It would most likely be best if the controlling of the level that the double check effort...
has anybody seen this before? I don't have any machines running LINUX right now but while i ws in the ECC2 forums i noticed a link to here.
http://www.its.caltech.edu/~sgeier/code/sbwrap.html
...
can you run 1.2.1 and just not have it report back to the server? Then use version 1.2.0 to send in the results???
From my understanding ok the likelyness of primes in certain regions and for certain K values I'd expect the final completion date would depend mostly upon the day we find a prime for 67607 because...
As long as i can remember i believe. I thought i made a mention bout it a while ago but never found a reply. However, I can't find my post so maybe it was so late i sumbited the thread wrong. Late...
I tried reinstalling the old client and there is a definate 5% speed increase on my computer. At least thats what the programs report as the speed. Perhaps this is just a reporting differance. ...
I just downloaded the new client version .40 and it seems ot have given me a speed increase but i didn't expect it to so i don't remember what speed i had before. I'm quite certain it is faster now...
any info on this
Does anyone have a AMD 3200? Just wondering what type of speed they get?
in my opinion no because the same effort could be used to sieve a higher range the first time and this would find more useful factors. Perhaps there is some benefit to sieving 300000 to 3000000 but...
These tests are very easy to test and for the most part have a very low error rate. In fact these test don't need to be redone at all because it is very unlikely that we have missed a prime there...
The stats on the site are generated as a per amount of time graph. Meaning that if you only ran the cient for a few hours out of the day it'll only show the average rate you had. Also if you have...
oh well i guess i hadn't encountered that yet. Will it stil produce valid progress on a test? Hence can it be used in the mean time until a fix comes out.
Maybe I'm not even usingthat one i have...
What does alien mean 1.2.1 is broken? What is wrong with it?
That would depend somewhat on the testyou were running. If you had been running a secret test and then ran a regular tet the Cem/s ratio would have little meaning. Another explanation is we may...
many weaker boxs can be efficiently used in sieving.
With recent events it certainly appears we are going to be recieving alot more help soon. We've got a new client offering a boost in efficiency, a new prime boosting membership, and since most of...
out of range factors will be saved in a different folder. Although these factors have no use to us at the moment at some time in the future the sieve effort will be altered to sieve values above...
the server expires tests 10 days from the last time they heard from you. If you don't have intermediate blocks sent and the test takes more than 10 days it will be reassigned. If the test is...
Where did this come from originally? Has this been implimented yet? Can it be?
Do these look different if regenerated and updated to account for not finding primes up to certain values. If you don't mind me wanting to know where this stands right now.
So this could still happen now that we have a prime logged again and some more members mustering their CPUs.
yup :thumb:
It would be nice if we could skip the rest of 400,000 to 1,000,000 unless someone thinks that some of those have been misreported. As far as I've heard we haven't gotten a single...
So the optimal level would be around 500000?
Could the server be programmed to assign secret tests to be done under people names so they could get credit and meanwhile reguardless of how people...