Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Speed by Processor type

  1. #1
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619

    Speed by Processor type

    This is shamelessly being pulled from a post by BlisteringSheep over on Ars Forum.
    I'm afraid the thread will roll off and this good information will be eventually lost or hard to find.
    It really depends on the specific chip. All of my P4-Xeons have had higher aggregate rates with using all HT cores. My 3.06 GHz Northwood, running WinXP, is faster with just using one core, while the 3.20 GHz Nocano, also running WinXP, is faster while using both cores. Here are some rates gathered from currently running machines, not from -bench or -benchmark. Unless otherwise specified, all x86's are running 32-bit Linux, all PowerPC's are running 64-bit Linux, and all cores are active (num_threads=-1):
    • 3.06 GHz Northwood, using both HT cores, WinXP, 11 Mnodes/s/core, 22 Mnodes/s aggregate
    • 3.06 GHz Northwood, using one core, WinXP, 29 Mnodes/s
    • 3.20 GHz Nocano, using both HT cores, WinXP, 17 Mnodes/s/core, 33-34 Mnodes/s aggregate
    • 3.20 GHz Nocano, using one core, WinXP, 28 Mnodes/s
    • Random other timings:
    • Intel
    • 2.83 GHz E5440, 44 Mnodes/s/core
    • 2.8 GHz HT Xeon, 13-14 Mnodes/s/core
    • 2.8 GHz Xeon (non-HT), 17 Mnodes/s/core
    • 2.5 GHz Northwood (non-HT), 26 Mnode/s
    • 2.40 GHz HT Xeon, 13 Mnodes/s/core
    • 200 MHz Pentium MMX, 1.3 Mnodes/s
    • AMD
    • Opteron 240, 17-18 Mnodes/s/core
    • 1.0 GHz Athlon, 13 Mnodes/s
    • Misc
    • 400 MHz UltraSPARC-IIi, Solaris 6, 4.7 Mnodes/s
    • Sony Playstation 3, 64-bit Linux, 227-232 Mnodes/s
    • PowerPC
    • 2.5 GHz PPC970MP, 23-24 Mnodes/s/core
    • 2.3 GHz PPC970FX Xserve, 22 Mnodes/s/core
    • 2.2 GHz PPC970FX, 20-21 Mnodes/s/core
    • 2.0 GHz PPC970 PowerMac, 19 Mnodes/s/core
    • 1.9 GHz POWER5, 11-12 Mnodes/s/core
    • 1.65 GHz POWER5, 10-11 Mnodes/s/core

  2. #2
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619

    PS3 Performance

    This represents 10 full days of processing for all nodes. ps10 was crunching RC5 for about 5 hours at this snapshot.

  3. #3
    Administrator PCZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Chertsey Surrey UK
    Posts
    2,428

  4. #4
    =>Team Joker<= LAURENU2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Chicago IL USA
    Posts
    5,478
    Blog Entries
    1
    At that speed 7 min might the longest he could run it without blue-ing out

  5. #5
    Administrator PCZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Chertsey Surrey UK
    Posts
    2,428
    Lauren

    That PC runs 24/7
    I stopped the service and loaded up dnetc to get the interface up.

    It is fsb.
    see pic below

  6. #6
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    Nice!
    What are
    netmon
    netmon2
    fsb
    dload

    They crank almost like a PS3

  7. #7
    Administrator PCZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Chertsey Surrey UK
    Posts
    2,428
    IB

    The netmons are 8 way Xeons, old 2.8ghz Netburst.
    Thats eight cores, 16 wih HT but i disable that in the bios.
    I used to run Network Monitoring tools on them when the pharm was bigger.


    dload and dc6 are q6600's running at 3.2Ghz.
    dc6 only just got upgraded to a quad so it's total isn't very high but it will rise through the ranks i'm sure.

    fsb is a Q6600 running at 3.6Ghz, it is a nice chip and does that speed at low vcore.
    I will be changing that PC from a file server into my video encoding box shortly.

    Rest of the boxes are dual cores in the main, xp-game being the only noteworthy one as it's the new 45nm Wolfdale.
    Clocks really well.

    BTW
    old-game is my retro box running win98se and dos some times

  8. #8
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    Very nice pharmage my friend.

  9. #9
    Administrator PCZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Chertsey Surrey UK
    Posts
    2,428
    Thanks IB

    I'm trying to get back into the game.
    Need to replace those old boxes with Quads.
    Have a plan to replace one old box a month with a quad to upgrade the pharm.

    Each new cruncher is
    Gigabye P35 DS3L, q6600, Freezer 7 pro and 2 gigs of geil.
    My old 400 watt PSU's seem to cope fine with the quads.

  10. #10
    Administrator Bok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Wake Forest, North Carolina, United States
    Posts
    24,467
    Blog Entries
    13
    Those Gigabyte P35's are real nice for the price..

  11. #11
    =>Team Joker<= LAURENU2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Chicago IL USA
    Posts
    5,478
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by PCZ View Post
    Thanks IB
    I'm trying to get back into the game.
    Need to replace those old boxes with Quads.
    Have a plan to replace one old box a month with a quad to upgrade the pharm.
    Intel® Boxed Core™ 2 Quad Processor Q6600 199.99 at microcenter.com
    (edit)
    Ouch Did not see It is for instore only But I have one down the way from me if need be

  12. #12
    This is from the repeatable dnetc benchmark function. Live WUs aren't repeatable and can vary quite a bit.

    Code:
    PentiumMMX P55c GARSP 6.0-asm-rt1-mmx
    200MHz: 1.31 Mnode: 153 clock/node
    
    UltraSPARC IIi Sapphire-Red (2048k) GARSP 6.0 (unoptimised?)
    400MHz: 4.7 Mnode: 85.1 clock/node
    
    P3 Coppermine (256k) GARSP 6.0-asm-rt1-mmx
    575MHz: 7.58 Mnode: 75.9 clock/node
    560MHz: 7.42 Mnode: 75.5 clock/node
    550MHz: 7.22 Mnode: 76.2 clock/node
    525MHz: 6.94 Mnode: 75.6 clock/node
    515MHz: 6.84 Mnode: 75.3 clock/node
    500MHz: 6.65 Mnode: 75.2 clock/node
    417MHz: 5.52 Mnode: 75.5 clock/node
    375MHz: 4.90 Mnode: 76.5 clock/node
    334MHz: 4.39 Mnode: 76.1 clock/node
    
    K7 Orion (512k) GARSP 6.0-asm-rt1-mmx-amd
    1000MHz: 13.0 Mnode: 76.9 clock/node
    
    PowerPC 970 (512k) GARSP 5.13 Scalar *UNOPTIMISED CORE*
    2000MHz: 19.0 Mnode: 105 clock/node
    
    PowerPC 970 (512k) KOGE 2.0 Hybrid
    2000MHz: 33.9 Mnode: 59.0 clock/node
    
    K8 Opteron Venus/San Diego E4 (1024k) GARSP 6.0-asm-rt1-mmx-amd
    2400MHz: 31.4Mnode: 76.4 clock/node
    
    K8 Opteron Denmark/Toledo E6 (1024k) GARSP 6.0-asm-rt1-mmx-amd
    2712MHz: 35.0 Mnode: 77.5 clock/node
    1507MHz: 20.0 Mnode: 75.4 clock/node
    
    K8 AthlonX2 GARSP 6.0-asm-rt1-mmx-amd
    2840MHz: 37.8 Mnode: 75.1 clock/node
    
    Xeon Harpertown E5440 GARSP 6.0-asm-rt1-mmx-amd
    2833MHz: 43.8 Mnode: 64.7 clock/node
    
    Core2 Quad (4096?) GARSP 6.0-asm-rt1-mmx
    3020MHz: 46.0 Mnode: 65.7 clock/node
    3280MHz: 51.2 Mnode: 64.1 clock/node
    
    P4 Northwood (512k) GARSP 6.0-asm-rt1-mmx
    2500MHz: 25.9 Mnode: 96.5 clock/node
    3000MHz: 29.8 Mnode: 100 clock/node
    3060MHz: 30.0 Mnode: 102 clock/node
    
    P4 Nocona/Prescott (1024k) GARSP 6.0-asm-rt1-mmx-amd
    3200MHz: 28.3 Mnode: 113 clock/node

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •