That is excellent, thanks Bok.
I imagine there will be a few slightly confused people tomorrow, wandering what exactly it was they did to suddenly get a new MegaMilestone.
That is excellent, thanks Bok.
I imagine there will be a few slightly confused people tomorrow, wandering what exactly it was they did to suddenly get a new MegaMilestone.
Cool Bok - but whilst it's nice to see the full list of Maxwell owners, but I am baffled - at first I thought that as it still says "Most maxwells Scores (>2 for inclusion)" that meant that it still wouldn't appear in the "Mega Milestones" box on my CPID stats, but having gone down the full list of Maxwell's I appear to not be in it despite being fairly sure that at the moment I had 2, one for Clanks and one for TeraBoks. Has my quest for Maxwells been in vain? ;-) Have I misunderstood something obvious?
I'll fix the title, but yes I'm afraid you aren't quite there yet based in the definition. (It's difficult!).
Here is a quick breakdown of your metadata, remember you need to have at least half of the max to get the maxwell..., so score below needs to be >= maxwellsmax
Here is mine for comparison..Code:mysql> select mtype,score,maxwells,maxwellsmax from mm where cpid = 'fa1a611d7c2bb42d13617eb6b8903f8c'; +-------+-------+----------+-------------+ | mtype | score | maxwells | maxwellsmax | +-------+-------+----------+-------------+ | 100k | 13 | 0 | 123 | | 10k | 58 | 0 | 131 | | 10m | 1 | 0 | 22 | | 1k | 61 | 0 | 137 | | 1m | 5 | 0 | 78 | | 2.5m | 2 | 0 | 46 | | 250k | 6 | 0 | 102 | | 25k | 23 | 0 | 127 | | 500k | 6 | 0 | 89 | | 50k | 13 | 0 | 124 | | 5m | 2 | 0 | 28 | | 750k | 6 | 0 | 82 | | p100 | 3 | 0 | 113 | | p1000 | 25 | 0 | 138 | | proj | 61 | 0 | 141 | +-------+-------+----------+-------------+ 15 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Code:mysql> select mtype,score,maxwells,maxwellsmax from mm where cpid = 'c843714b32e467b97d2571d1af9971f8'; +-------+-------+----------+-------------+ | mtype | score | maxwells | maxwellsmax | +-------+-------+----------+-------------+ | 100k | 101 | 1 | 123 | | 10k | 117 | 1 | 131 | | 10m | 2 | 0 | 22 | | 1k | 127 | 1 | 137 | | 1m | 10 | 0 | 78 | | 2.5m | 6 | 0 | 46 | | 250k | 22 | 0 | 102 | | 25k | 107 | 1 | 127 | | 500k | 12 | 0 | 89 | | 50k | 102 | 1 | 124 | | 5m | 3 | 0 | 28 | | 750k | 10 | 0 | 82 | | p10 | 3 | 0 | 48 | | p100 | 49 | 0 | 113 | | p1000 | 104 | 1 | 138 | | proj | 134 | 1 | 141 | +-------+-------+----------+-------------+ 16 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Oh! Do I take it from that data that you don't get a Maxwell for Boks/TeraBoks/Trigggls/Clanks and Viaos?
Whyever not? Surely Boks and TeraBoks are good enough for a Maxwell BoK? ;-)
BTW That's a fine set of data you have there. Well done.
hmm, maybe I should change that. Will take a look today.
Done...
Bok! You are a star (You make it look too easy though ;-) r
I now have a Maxwell! - not sure for which of Clanks or for TeraBoks but I don't care! Unless you have set them to be > rather than >= half the maxwellsmax?
Many thanks though, I have one - that is all that mattered to me! :-)
Hi. Yes you told me who you were without me asking, ty for that.
Now, as for your unbanning based upon recent unbannings. When you are banned for as long as they were, please feel free to post a plea for your unbanning.
We will talk about it then.
Thanks
ÊÀÊ ÓÑÒÐÎÅÍ ÁÈÇÍÅÑ ÊÎÌÏÀÍÈÉ ÏÎËÈ-ÏÐÎ, ÐÅÖÈÊËÅÍ, ÝÂÅËÀÊ ÏÎ ÂÒÎÐÈ×ÍÎÉ ÏÅÐÅÐÀÁÎÒÊÅ ÎÒÕÎÄΠÏËÀÑÒÌÀÑÑ
https://recyclene.info/index.php
Ìû â Âêîíòàêòå:
https://vk.com/recyclene