Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Bad performance with 64 bit Linux?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    almost retired the-mk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    KI/OOE/Austria
    Posts
    1,921
    Blog Entries
    6
    Maybe I've found the issue: AMD cool'n'quiet...

    took a look at /proc/cpuinfo where it states that the CPU runs at 1000 mhz (even during dnetc)

    disabled that feature in bios, now /proc/cpuinfo shows about 2500 mhz

    hopefully the MNodes/s increase
    the-mk

  2. #2
    almost retired the-mk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    KI/OOE/Austria
    Posts
    1,921
    Blog Entries
    6
    Now it behaves like a 4800+ X2 should do:

    [Jul 20 18:13:44 UTC] Automatic processor detection found 2 processors.
    [Jul 20 18:13:44 UTC] Loading crunchers with work...
    [Jul 20 18:13:44 UTC] Automatic processor type detection found
    an AMD K8-11 processor.
    [Jul 20 18:13:44 UTC] OGR-P2: using core #4 (GARSP 6.0-asm-rt1-mmx-amd).
    [Jul 20 18:13:44 UTC] OGR-P2 #a: Loaded 25/1-6-4-9-18-57 (5.65 Gnodes done)
    [Jul 20 18:13:44 UTC] OGR-P2 #b: Loaded 25/1-6-4-9-18-56 (8.28 Gnodes done)
    [Jul 20 18:13:44 UTC] OGR-P2: 40 packets remain in buff-in.ogf
    [Jul 20 18:13:44 UTC] OGR-P2: 0 packets are in buff-out.ogf
    [Jul 20 18:13:44 UTC] 2 crunchers ('a' and 'b') have been started.
    [Jul 20 18:19:38 UTC] OGR-P2 #b: Completed 25/1-6-4-9-18-56 (19.47 stats units)
    0.00:05:53.75 - [31,616,409 nodes/s]
    [Jul 20 18:19:38 UTC] OGR-P2 #b: 25/1-6-4-9-18-56 [19,468,188,016 nodes]
    [Jul 20 18:19:38 UTC] OGR-P2 #b: Loaded 25/1-6-4-9-23-51
    [Jul 20 18:19:38 UTC] OGR-P2: Summary: 1 packet (19.47 stats units)
    0.00:05:53.75 - [31.62 Mnodes/s]
    [Jul 20 18:19:38 UTC] OGR-P2: 39 packets remain in buff-in.ogf
    [Jul 20 18:19:38 UTC] OGR-P2: 1 packet (19.47 stats units) is in
    buff-out.ogf
    [Jul 20 18:19:58 UTC] OGR-P2 #a: Completed 25/1-6-4-9-18-57 (17.55 stats units)
    0.00:06:14.04 - [31,815,687 nodes/s]
    [Jul 20 18:19:58 UTC] OGR-P2 #a: 25/1-6-4-9-18-57 [17,546,561,193 nodes]
    [Jul 20 18:19:58 UTC] OGR-P2 #a: Loaded 25/1-6-4-9-51-23
    [Jul 20 18:19:58 UTC] OGR-P2: Summary: 2 packets (37.02 stats units)
    0.00:06:14.19 - [61.69 Mnodes/s]
    [Jul 20 18:19:58 UTC] OGR-P2: 38 packets remain in buff-in.ogf
    [Jul 20 18:19:58 UTC] OGR-P2: 2 packets (37.02 stats units) are in
    buff-out.ogf
    cool'n'quiet

    but since the x64-client has a little bit more MNodes/s I'll set up the x64 environment once again...
    the-mk

  3. #3
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    Quote Originally Posted by the-mk
    Now it behaves like a 4800+ X2 should do:

    cool'n'quiet

    but since the x64-client has a little bit more MNodes/s I'll set up the x64 environment once again...
    Yup! Nothing new there, keep it disabled at all times.

  4. #4
    Dungeon Master alpha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Norfolk, UK
    Posts
    1,700
    That doesn't explain why the 64-bit client was benchmarking faster than the 32-bit client, but ended up being slower during actual crunching. Or does cool n' quiet only kick in after x seconds of high load?

  5. #5
    almost retired the-mk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    KI/OOE/Austria
    Posts
    1,921
    Blog Entries
    6
    IMHO cool'n'quiet leaves the cpu at 1000 MHz, while there is no process using 100% when having a high priority. dnetc has only low priority, so it stays at 1000 MHz... So I think it'll increase MHz if you have a process with higher priority and higher load, but not so with dnetc, since it has low priority.
    the-mk

  6. #6
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    Cool and Quiet will try to reduce the processor speed every chance it gets.
    When you are crunching, you never want the processor to slow down to save energy ($$$) or to run cooler (Get a bigger HSF).
    http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/...l?redir=dtqc04

    I have it disabled via the BIOS on any computer that I want full performance at all times.
    It's a good thing to use when you have a laptop and want to conserve battery life.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •