Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Gap Analysis Discussion

  1. #1
    Moderator Joe O's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    West Milford, NJ
    Posts
    643

    Gap Analysis Discussion

    MikeH's excellent report currently shows:

    SB Sieving and factoring gaps analysis 100.000T < p < 1000.000T (1.0M < n < 20.0M)


    Last Update: Sat 15-Jul-2006 21:19 (GMT+1)


    RATIO: 927606.37G - 928167.03G, size: 560.67G, est fact: 7 (927606368641207-928167034434677) R: 1.145, S: 0.353
    ( 560.67G) : 927300 928300 Rychek Reserved 2005-09-29

    RATIO: 956466.39G - 956980.56G, size: 514.17G, est fact: 6 (956466385783841-956980555805459) R: 1.018, S: 0.335
    #*# ( 514.17G) : 956000 957000 Rychek [complete] Pending 2005-11-09

    RATIO: 967320.02G - 968024.07G, size: 704.05G, est fact: 9 (967320021360263-968024069888537) R: 1.378, S: 0.511
    ( 704.05G) : 967300 968300 Rychek Reserved 2005-12-05



    Gaps found: 3

    Please do not resieve these gaps.
    The first one has already been resieved, and is a true gap. MikeH has been notified.
    The second two are currently being resieved. Results will be posted in August.
    Joe O

  2. #2
    Moderator Joe O's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    West Milford, NJ
    Posts
    643
    MikeH's excellent report currently shows:

    SB Sieving and factoring gaps analysis 100.000T < p < 1000.000T (1.0M < n < 20.0M)


    Last Update: Fri 04-Aug-2006 10:38 (GMT+1)


    RATIO: 927606.37G - 928167.03G, size: 560.67G, est fact: 7 (927606368641207-928167034434677) R: 1.145, S: 0.489
    ( 560.67G) : 927300 928300 Rychek Reserved 2005-09-29

    RATIO: 956466.39G - 956980.56G, size: 514.17G, est fact: 6 (956466385783841-956980555805459) R: 1.018, S: 0.465
    #*# ( 514.17G) : 956000 957000 Rychek [complete] Pending 2005-11-09



    Gaps found: 2
    Gaps size: 1074.84G (1.07%)
    Factors in range: unique:1306, duplicate:396, excluded:11484
    Factors missing (estimated): 13 - 143


    Please do not resieve these gaps.

    They have already been resieved, and are real gaps that should be in the accepted gaps section.
    MikeH please take note of this.
    Also in the SB Sieving and factoring gaps analysis 1000.000T < p < 2000.000T (1.0M < n < 20.0M) report,
    at least 13 of the 136 gaps should be in the accepted gaps section.

    Our efforts at this time should be concentrated on new ranges.
    Joe O

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •