jasong
10-04-2007, 05:05 PM
The website for Clearspeed says that a task has to be easily parallizable(Okay, I give up on satisfying spellcheck) for Clearspeed to be a good idea. By "easily parallizable" I think they mean conceptually easy, since programming is almost always hard for anything remotely complicated.
Easily parallizable stuff is one of the things that defines a good distributed computing idea. Maybe we should look into getting one of these things at one point, then get a program like LLR working on it.
I, personally, would love to have one of these things. Assuming, of course, that I had programs to run on it, which I don't.
Clearspeed (http://www.clearspeed.com)
Easily parallizable stuff is one of the things that defines a good distributed computing idea. Maybe we should look into getting one of these things at one point, then get a program like LLR working on it.
I, personally, would love to have one of these things. Assuming, of course, that I had programs to run on it, which I don't.
Clearspeed (http://www.clearspeed.com)