hc_grove
12-06-2011, 05:42 AM
I don't understand the daily rates of my user stats.
Today I see the following numbers (on http://seventeenorbust.com/stats/users/user.mhtml?userID=2437):
Work rate 14.81 M jEMs/sec
Work done 1.92 T jEMs (0.2%)
But when I divide 1.92T jEMs by 86400 seconds, I get 22222222.2222 which is quite far from the 14.81M.
I gets even worse when I look to the rankings, under "Neighbors: Last Day's Rate", I'm 107th with 3.63M which is very far from either of the numbers above.
My overall rate matches quite nicely though 873.74T jEMs/(3240.6 days*86400 seconds/day) is 3.12M jEMs/s
Is this an result of having two machines (I was transitioning from one to the other), with one of them just being turned of in the middle of a test, for a few weeks at the end of september? The new computer which isn't much faster than the old. has completed several pairs (it's a dual core, so it works on two in parallel) of tests since, so I would assume that deductions from the lost work would be completely done by now, if that's not the case, when can I expect these numbers to start making sense again.
I don't understand the red/blue arrows in the ranking tables either, today I have a red arrow in all three tables, but yesterday I had the same place (256th) in "Total Production", and was 116th (which is lower than the current 107th) in "Last Day's Rate". (I don't remember what position I had in "Overall rate"). But they are easy to ignore.
.Henrik
Today I see the following numbers (on http://seventeenorbust.com/stats/users/user.mhtml?userID=2437):
Work rate 14.81 M jEMs/sec
Work done 1.92 T jEMs (0.2%)
But when I divide 1.92T jEMs by 86400 seconds, I get 22222222.2222 which is quite far from the 14.81M.
I gets even worse when I look to the rankings, under "Neighbors: Last Day's Rate", I'm 107th with 3.63M which is very far from either of the numbers above.
My overall rate matches quite nicely though 873.74T jEMs/(3240.6 days*86400 seconds/day) is 3.12M jEMs/s
Is this an result of having two machines (I was transitioning from one to the other), with one of them just being turned of in the middle of a test, for a few weeks at the end of september? The new computer which isn't much faster than the old. has completed several pairs (it's a dual core, so it works on two in parallel) of tests since, so I would assume that deductions from the lost work would be completely done by now, if that's not the case, when can I expect these numbers to start making sense again.
I don't understand the red/blue arrows in the ranking tables either, today I have a red arrow in all three tables, but yesterday I had the same place (256th) in "Total Production", and was 116th (which is lower than the current 107th) in "Last Day's Rate". (I don't remember what position I had in "Overall rate"). But they are easy to ignore.
.Henrik