Improving stats view

[Death]

http://www.aooq73.dsl.pipex.com/scores.htm

User scores
Ranges complete/reserved
Pos UserName Score ( %) FacU ( %) FacD n<3M 3M<n<20M n>20M Excluded n<3M 3M<n<20M

1 MikeH 2259527.07+(19.36) 47045+(12.30) 3161 26574+ 20471+ 0 2735 34965 29880/39065
2 OrkunBanuTST (Nuri) 1352136.03+(11.59) 19891 ( 5.20) 1599 3247 16644 0 3866 7500 21000/25000
3 Mystwalker 1228445.24+(10.53) 6944+( 1.82) 591 636+ 6308+ 0 189 18627 14627/21227


I wish that the even or odd lines have some gray backgound. The table will be much more readable...

[MikeH]

Something like that (http://www.aooq73.dsl.pipex.com/scores.htm) ?

[pixl97]

Thats great MikeH, the scores are much more readable now.

Heres a graphical view of the gaps between 100T and 400T I conjoured up.

http://pixl.goquest.com/sb/seive100T-400T.jpg

[Death]

well, now it looks very well.
thanks.

[Nuri]

It looks much nicer now. Thanks for the idea and implementation.

[Death]

well got a question

how long it take to personal stats updating.
http://www.aooq73.dsl.pipex.com/ui/3419.htm

at bottom

Reserved ranges

Incomplete


171000 - 171500 must be in complete
and also 500000-500015 was completed yesterday



is this changed manually or automatically?

[MikeH]

is this changed manually or automatically? It's manual. I update them at least once a week, but not as often as every day.

[Death]

Originally posted by MikeH
It's manual. I update them at least once a week, but not as often as every day.

got it.

btw, are you from GB?

[MikeH]

btw, are you from GB? Yep. I'm about 30 miles west of London.

[Death]

Originally posted by MikeH
Yep. I'm about 30 miles west of London.

just wondering why dont you sleep at 6 at the morning =)))
seems that's everybody is sleeping so nobody at forum....

[Death]

Daily change last 1 day : -0.00

why minus?

[MikeH]

This problem can be summed up in two words "rounding errors".

Basically, the scores for each unique factor are stored (but to a limited number of decimal places). On each stats run those scores are recalculated. The new result always has better precision than the stored result, so there will always be a small error, which can be positive or negative.

I guess I could fix it, but somehow it feels "quaint".

[Death]

Originally posted by MikeH
This problem can be summed up in two words "rounding errors".

Basically, the scores for each unique factor are stored (but to a limited number of decimal places). On each stats run those scores are recalculated. The new result always has better precision than the stored result, so there will always be a small error, which can be positive or negative.

I guess I could fix it, but somehow it feels "quaint".

Definitions of quaint on the Web:

strange in an interesting or pleasing way; "quaint dialect words"; "quaint streets of New Orleans, that most foreign of American cities"
www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn


very strange or unusual; odd or even incongruous in character or appearance; "the head terminating in the quaint duck bill which gives the animal its vernacular name"- Bill Beatty; "came forth a quaint and fearful sight"- Sir Walter Scott; "a quaint sense of humor"
www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn


attractively old-fashioned (but not necessarily authentic); "houses with quaint thatched roofs"; "a vaulted roof supporting old-time chimney pots"
www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn


curiously beautiful
www.shakespeare.sk/Glossary/Glossary_Q.html


dròl
www.haitiwebs.com/cook2/glossary/index.php


me 2 =)))))))))))))