Lauren up 2510 places

[Fozzie]

I bet you haven't seen that in a while.

[Dreamer]

WTG, Lauren!

Glad to see you found a new project to work on! WooHoo!

[PY 222]

Wow... there must be alot of dead wood floating at the bottom of the pile eh.

Come on Lauren, climb up the ranks where you belong.

[LAURENU2]

I only have a few nodes running it I will have to tear apart some nodes to seeal ram and more HD space A few of my nodes are running 125 MB ram and 850 MB to 1.2 gig Hard drives All they did was crunch FAD

And my nodes have only been working 20 HRs so far it will take a few days to steep over all the dead wood to get up there

[PY 222]

Lauren, what kind of RAM are you looking for on your puters?

Let me know.

[LAURENU2]

most are DDR I might have some 133 around too I will know more after I trim the network down and give it a cleaning It has been running 24/7 for over 1,000 days without stop Lots of dust and dried out thermal paste

Are the COWs working this project I did not see them listed ? Just so I know to look for Cow Phit laying around

[PY 222]

Any specific DDRs you are looking for? PC2100, or PC2700?

I'll go ransack my tool box. So you clean out your puters and send me a PM of what you need.

I might have it.

[dannychuckle]

hey Lauren I found you can do a kind of cheating network install with rosetta if you don't wanna have to upgrade the smaller hard drives (although I'd have thought 8GB would be plenty for rosetta???):

Create a partition for rosetta and install it there
Shut rosetta down if its started running
Create a shared dir on the server and move the rosetta files to it
Assign a different drive letter to the local partition that you created
(or remove the partition)
Map the shared rosetta dir using the drive letter that you used for the partition when you installed.

This is working fine for me on a PC that boots from compactflash (so it can't have files written to it constantly), and even if the HDs are big enough, this way they're not being written to on a cruncher so they can spin down saving your ears and electric bills!

Hope thats useful
Danny

[LAURENU2]

Well I found out why I had problems with resources on the installs After a 1000, plus Day run of 24/7
doing FAD there was 500 to 1000 Meg stored in the restore folder And it needed a good defrag I have close to 1/2 my Pharm changed over to Rosetta now
As the other 1/2 finish up the FAD jobs they will come over to
And I just made it to the fist page of our team stats there at Rosetta I hate flipping pages

[Bok]

[LAURENU2]

I am having a hard time understanding the stats at http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/te...redit&offset=0

When I look at the Total credit I have 42,614.04 points with 2,973.13 points listed under Recent average credit

But when I sort it by Recent average credit I get only 30,876.69 points and 2,335.39 points listed under Recent average credit

Why the Difference or am I missing something

>>>>>>>>>>>Total credit >>Recent average credit
11) Laurenu2 42,614.04 =====2,973.13

>7) Laurenu2 30,876.69 =====2,335.39

[IronBits]

It gets better when looking here
http://www.boincstats.com/stats/user...osetta&id=9752

[LAURENU2]

Even more different numbers

Well it looks like I will be getting a seat some where in a Teens row now that I have passed all the dead logs

[Bok]

Originally posted by LAURENU2
I am having a hard time understanding the stats at http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/te...redit&offset=0

When I look at the Total credit I have 42,614.04 points with 2,973.13 points listed under Recent average credit

But when I sort it by Recent average credit I get only 30,876.69 points and 2,335.39 points listed under Recent average credit

Why the Difference or am I missing something

>>>>>>>>>>>Total credit >>Recent average credit
11) Laurenu2 42,614.04 =====2,973.13

>7) Laurenu2 30,876.69 =====2,335.39

Looks okay on the bakerlab site now. It must have been a borkup on the offset of RAC which is given in the xml stats.

[Angus]

The ranking stats on the Rosetta ( and other) BOINC sites are static pages, generated at intervals by scripts, but at different times. It's not unusual to see total score or RAC out of whack on different sorted versions of the pages.