Shouldn't you post the result.dat instead of the txt file? I believe it's the txt that is used to send results back to the server.
Printable View
Shouldn't you post the result.dat instead of the txt file? I believe it's the txt that is used to send results back to the server.
It has identical data, but I don;t have to do any cut and paste on my end. I'm lazy. Also, at the moment, my results.dat is 3+MB and growing at ~200k a day. For my one computer, the other one is starting from scratch, and I'm not having it download from a central server!
If people want, I'll doa culling of my results.dat file for all results with 2.4+% returns,
I'd like to see how far others are getting, and possibly a couple of their results too!
magicfan241
Here's my top 100, ranging from 3.43% to 3.77%.
I extracted it from almost 3000 results, using MuonMonitor. I had to rename it since it wouldn't let me upload a .dat file.
This is one strain, from one machine, no added results from outside sources.
Thanks Wirthi and magicfan, I merged them with mine.
Heres my top 100 before I merged. My best is 2.45%
Here's a compilation from my boxes, in the 2.5-2.7 range: