I don't understand the daily rates of my user stats.
Today I see the following numbers (on http://seventeenorbust.com/stats/users/user.mhtml?userID=2437):
Work rate 14.81 M jEMs/sec
Work...
Type: Posts; User: hc_grove
I don't understand the daily rates of my user stats.
Today I see the following numbers (on http://seventeenorbust.com/stats/users/user.mhtml?userID=2437):
Work rate 14.81 M jEMs/sec
Work...
I have also tried submitting a few factors today, none of those I tried submitting in the usual submission form worked, but the one found using p-1-factoring luckily was big enough to use the...
Yes. Check out:
The sieving and factoring stats
None of the factors I've tried submitting today worked, whether I tried submitting them sperately or more at a time. :cry: Among those were:
181022579901641 | 19249*2^5530478+1
which is already...
:bs:
Which is approximately 100000 times as much as the factors!
I considered that (and even tried submitting them there - as the finder of the largest factor so far I know that page), no...
My sieve clients have found a couple of factors that doesn't verify according to http://www.seventeenorbust.com/sieve/
When I try submitting the following factors:
180567238560433 |...
There is no Linux version of 1.2.0. :(
Trying to assign a expiration time based on what computer is assigned the test, would cause weird results for me, since I move the tests from computer to computer depending on which are on and...
I'm not the administrator of those machines, so I can't really do anything. :(
The sb client doesn't use any dat file. :)
I have a somewhat similar setup, only I have both prp-tests and sieve-ranges (and technically factoring tests - but those only run on 1 or 2 computers)...
Because of an error making it impossible to test n's larger than 4980000.
Yes, hyperthreading is (almost) like having two CPU's, and the client only runs on one. On a real SMP system running...
Thank you.
This seems to have the network problem too, though, so I hope you'll make a version of 1.2.2, when that comes.
Thank you very much Louie, we have needed this for a long time.
Could we have a version that only depends on glibc 2.2? I'm not the administrator of all the machines I use for SoB, so I can't just...
It sounds very realistic that you haven't found any factors in a range that small.
If you got any results they would be in the fact.txt file, so take a look there (if you haven't found any factors...
It's the same for p-1.You have to manually reserve a range, tell the client the range and report the factors found.
I've tried p-1 factoring them, but found no factors.
Okay, I screwed up a little. :bang: Today I've submitted a number of factors without being logged in. :blush: Is it possible to have them properly assigned to me? (luckily none of them were...
But it is a problem for those of us doing p-1. I wasn't aware of the problem this morning, so I put my laptop to work on n's around 5.22M, if you are getting WU's around 5.21M now, that is a little...
But my 36 digit factor was found using B1=35000, B2=420000, so B1 and B2 doesn't have to be that big.
Having said that, I do think my factor will be our largest for quite a while. Maybe MikeH...
It's possible, it just requires that many more people (computers) work on SoB than GIMPS.
Realistically I don't think so. Some of my reasons for thinking so:
- For comparable n's each of our...
I redirect both STDOUT and STDERR with
./sbfactor 5134000 5136000 45 1.5 512 > uddata 2>&1
and that works.
Just in case anyone is interested, here is the factorization of p-1:
2*3*457*86491*8622413*13809557*9251514854849
Now I have. (I had completely forgotten about that page).
That's what I counted it to. :thumbs:
I'm having a little trouble reporting the last factor that I have found.
261252098359999236987971694398316499 | 28433*2^5314225+1
The factor is larger than 2^117 and the Sieve Result Submission...
I did wonder why that factor scored so much, thanks for the explanation.