Thanks. Singapore team has message board in hardwarezone.com
http://forums.hardwarezone.com/showthread.php?threadid=137&perpage=15&pagenumber=356
But you have to register in order to leave...
Type: Posts; User: xman
Thanks. Singapore team has message board in hardwarezone.com
http://forums.hardwarezone.com/showthread.php?threadid=137&perpage=15&pagenumber=356
But you have to register in order to leave...
Then that's good, probably there is no much change in the internal of the RedHat 8.0.
Anyone tried whether RedHat 8.0 can run the DF ?
Well, here is the particular instance of the speed of DF on alphaserver, EV6.8C, 1GHz with 8MB L2 Cache. However, it is found not better than my AMD MP 1.2GHz. But the structures per second is not...
OK. Thanks for replying. Well, even with different seed numbers, we cant prove that there is no duplication, because random function with different seed numbers may as well generate some identical...
I see. I thought the lock file is the starting time related value. However, i grabbed all the lock files in each machine, and found duplicated pid. Just that they might be started at different time....
I have tried using 5 seconds to 10 seconds ... Still cannot avoid duplication. Too bad.
Howard, is it possible to let us specify the random seed ? instead of using the time of the machines. I usually start all my machines using script. Thus, they are started within a few seconds, and...
WIll it be equavalent to the use of RAM-disk ? I used ramdisk on my AMD 1.2GHz, but I only get about 10% reduced in time.
Yes , you are right. The p3 is tualatin with 512K of cache, and with 1GB ram. Its result is competable with p4. However, it is still slower than alpha chip. And the alpha server i think is running...
The benchmark is running protein released today. The foldit file is using
./foldtrajlite -f protein -n native -qt -df -i f
I was doing comparison with the same protein with P3 1.26GHz and my poor...
This is running on AlphaServer with EV6.8 processor@1GHz (8MB cache)
------------------------------------------------------------
Distributed Folding Benchmark Script V1.0
Sample Size: 1015...
I see. That's better. I was worrying about it because I'm afraid that starting with the same time (same seed number) will generate duplicate copies, thus reduce the chance of getting good structures....
But my concern is that if I start many copies in a script, then the chances of using identical seed number would be increased.
Since the DF is running without the need to communicate with the server, so what kind of protein structures will be generated depends on kind of random number ? If this is the case, then is that...
Just to clear some confusion caused by the old client which does not work on RedHat 7.3. For Distributed Folding of 16 May onwards, they works fine on RedHat 7.3 using icc version. I suppose they...
Think another version for RedHat 7.3 is not needed anymore. I tried the new 16 May version, and it works fine in my machine.
Is it possible to place a link in this forum to the gcc compiled in RedHat 7.3, for us who using RedHat 7.3 temporary (not linked in the website) ? If you find the download count is high, you could...
I used RedHat 7.2 previously, and it running fine. After got hang up after upgraded to 7.3
Anyone tried using redhat 7.3 for the folding ? I used to run the df in my redhat 7.2. But after I upgrade it to 7.3, the df program stop running at
"Handle found. Using gx11kx85. To change,...
It's monday at my side now.:haddock:
AMD dual MP 1.2GHz :
Process 1 : 1194 structures
Process 2 : 1420 structures
Both running for 32 minutes already. Much slower comparing to previous protein.:smoking:
Hi, is it possible to provide CPU time statistic like what www.ud.com does ? So that we know how long we have crunched, and in overall, how long have we spent to complete the mission of each protein.