Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: new prime testing program -- anyone want to test?

  1. #1

    new prime testing program -- anyone want to test?

    It was posted in another thread but it appears that phil, one of the authors that worked a few years back to improve the sieving clients has been writing a prime testing app as well.

    It's written in C so it has the potential to work on lots of platforms beyond our current group but I was wondering how it performs vs SB? Are there people interested in benchmarking and letting us know?

    http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthr...?t=6650&page=3


    Cheers,
    Louie

  2. #2
    Former QueueMaster Ken_g6[TA]'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    184
    Well, here's a quick benchmark I did tonight on my Athlon XP 2200+ (1.8GHz):

    Phil's phrot program:
    Actually testing 635481*1048576^20480+1 (20482/49152 limbs)
    635481*2^409600+1 [-244748,-353119,372855,204230] is composite LLR64=F4D8A6DFADB
    1882C. (e=0.10944 (0.143278~6.95512e-16@1.053) t=2326.28s)

    By comparison, using the Seventeen or Bust client, in the past I've tested similar numbers in 1122 seconds:
    601467*2^409600+1 is not prime. Res64: C89279AB140D4564

    So it's not useful for x86 yet. When Phil gets his PPC code working, maybe some Mac afficionado (sp?) can try it.
    Proud member of the friendliest team around, Team Anandtech!
    The Queue is dead! (Or not needed.) Long Live George Woltman!

  3. #3
    the benchmark are not good for base 2. if you try it with other base, it will test 2 to 3 times faster than LLR. so it's not usefull for SOB except that it in a near future it will allow other processor architecture

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •