Bok's 100K thread

**Bok** · 01-18-2009, 09:14 AM

yes. We were talking about new tags on friday. I want to create a set to allow for different views / data.

This is a good idea, I hadn't thought about those..Easy enough.

**gopher_yarrowzoo** · 01-18-2009, 09:16 AM

Goes

at the thought, more coding and here was me thinking I could have the week off

**LAURENU2** · 01-19-2009, 11:19 PM

Originally Posted by Bok

ah, take a look at the top line...

Most 100K Scores(>7 for inclusion)

I think you have more work to do yet

I bet you can make it onto the list by end of the year....!!!

You have it posted ( Most 100k Scores (>7 for inclusion) )

I think you need to change it from 7 to 8 now

**Bok** · 01-19-2009, 11:31 PM

You think I should limit it to only those with more than 8 100k's rather than 7 ??

I see you only need one more as it stands to be included

You are ahead of me on the 500K list

:

**LAURENU2** · 01-20-2009, 01:15 AM

No you misunderstand the 100 K list Now only go's to 8's
So you need 8 100K's to be listed there No 7 as you have it posted
Most 100K Scores(>7 for inclusion) Needs to be > Most 100K Scores(>8 for inclusion)
Or provide more Pages to allow the 7's holders to be listed Or Not

**gopher_yarrowzoo** · 01-20-2009, 04:02 AM

Well think about it is says "> 7 for inclusion"...
Well 8 is 1 more than 7 so it's right if we did that
"Most 100k Scores (>7 for inclusion)" would need to read
"Most 100k Scores (>=8 for inclusion)"
Now what looks better, Mr Picky!

**LAURENU2** · 01-20-2009, 08:52 AM

Originally Posted by gopher_yarrowzoo

Well think about it is says "> 7 for inclusion"...
Well 8 is 1 more than 7 so it's right if we did that
"Most 100k Scores (>7 for inclusion)" would need to read
"Most 100k Scores (>=8 for inclusion)"
Now what looks better, Mr Picky!

gopher Have you been sucking on that fomented papaya tree again

**gopher_yarrowzoo** · 01-20-2009, 11:06 AM

*bounces off the walls* I don't know what you mean.

**Bok** · 01-25-2009, 05:57 PM

yay, this has taken sooooo long!!

**outlnder** · 01-25-2009, 08:23 PM

I don't know how you did that. I have tried to get ufluids to run, but I get a couple of completed WUs then it freezes and screws up my machine.

That is one big ass milestone, Bok. Excellent job!!

**Bok** · 01-25-2009, 09:32 PM

It's basically bad when you have more than 2 instances running on a machine, so a quadcore is really hardwork (therefore you are going to struggle!!!)..You have to end up downloading a bunch of units, suspend all but one and let it run through, then unsuspend each at a time..PIA. And with it being windows only, I ended up doing most of the work on a couple of dualcores I have that are XP..

Glad it's done though.. Now if only Ralph@Home will give out enough work to get up there

Bok

**alpha** · 01-26-2009, 05:09 AM

Couldn't you have just adjusted the BOINC preferences on each machine running it to only use one core? It's a per-machine preference, so you don't have to change your general settings for it to take effect.

Oh, and congrats.

**Bok** · 01-26-2009, 06:20 AM

but it's not a per-project preference.. so the other cores would have been idle, unless I used them up otherwise.

I didn't do it too much anyway, as I said I just used the dualcores instead. Took longer, but got there in the end

Bok

**Bok** · 01-26-2009, 12:12 PM

Today is a good day so far..

New work in Virtual Prairie, Superlink@technion and now Open Rendering, plus lots of Ralph work in cache

Yay!!

**zombie67** · 01-26-2009, 08:26 PM

Originally Posted by Bok

yay, this has taken sooooo long!!

uFluids is a hard one! The more cores it runs on at once, the slower it goes, squared. So the key is to run it on only dual core machines. Or if you have to run it on a quad or ocho, you have to make sure your resource share is very small...

Edit: D'oh! Didn't see that there was a whole next page of comments when I posted. I see my brilliant insight was not quite so unique....

**zombie67** · 01-26-2009, 08:36 PM

Originally Posted by Bok

Today is a good day so far..

New work in Virtual Prairie, Superlink@technion and now Open Rendering, plus lots of Ralph work in cache

Yay!!

No kidding! A wealth of scarce work...all at once!

**Bok** · 01-26-2009, 09:08 PM

Originally Posted by zombie67

uFluids is a hard one! The more cores it runs on at once, the slower it goes, squared. So the key is to run it on only dual core machines. Or if you have to run it on a quad or ocho, you have to make sure your resource share is very small...

Edit: D'oh! Didn't see that there was a whole next page of comments when I posted. I see my brilliant insight was not quite so unique....

I think I got it from one of your posts originally

**Liuqyn** · 01-27-2009, 07:17 PM

Speaking of Superlink@technion and ufluids, why aren't they listed alphabetically on my stats page, instead they are both at the bottom.

ps. nice job btw.

**Bok** · 01-27-2009, 07:49 PM

You mean on usermain rather than on the userbycpid.php (where is is ordered by score...)

It's because they begin with a lower case letter. I've altered this. It should update soon..

Bok

**Liuqyn** · 01-28-2009, 08:05 AM

ya, thats what I figured, thanks

**zombie67** · 01-30-2009, 07:52 AM

You probably already know this but....

Almost all of the "Most ..." stats haven't worked for at least a day now.

**Bok** · 01-30-2009, 08:56 AM

I know I broke them yesterday.. (I added a new column to the table to allow me to order the list by milestone size... for the new signature I have working ...

)

But I fixed them, they all seem to work for me now ?

Bok

**gopher_yarrowzoo** · 01-30-2009, 09:02 AM

Originally Posted by Bok

I know I broke them yesterday.. (I added a new column to the table to allow me to order the list by milestone size... for the new signature I have working ...

)

But I fixed them, they all seem to work for me now ?

Bok

Well saves me breaking it I suppose.

**BlackMountainCow** · 02-01-2009, 09:27 AM

Originally Posted by Bok

I know I broke them yesterday [...] But I fixed them, they all seem to work for me now ?
Bok

At least the 100k one still doesn't work for me.

**Bok** · 02-01-2009, 09:38 AM

Please tell me you are not using the one on stats4....

the real one

is working fine.. I've just ran through all of them and they are all working for me..

stats4 is broken and will not be fixed. It's old code and will be switched off this week perhaps.

Bok

**BlackMountainCow** · 02-01-2009, 11:45 AM

Guilty as charged!

**zombie67** · 02-03-2009, 09:09 PM

I see what Bok's working on!

**Bok** · 02-03-2009, 10:21 PM

Yeah, got a crapload of VTU work today.. Unexpected....

Slowed down my few other projects heading to 100K but they'll get there. I'll take the work right now !!

Very pleasantly surprised by some Brats@Home work too...

**zombie67** · 02-03-2009, 11:44 PM

Originally Posted by Bok

Yeah, got a crapload of VTU work today.. Unexpected....

Slowed down my few other projects heading to 100K but they'll get there. I'll take the work right now !!

With the server upgrade, he added the "Run test applications", so be sure to turn that on.

Originally Posted by Bok

Very pleasantly surprised by some Brats@Home work too...

No kidding! I was able to get 54 tasks over the past two days!

**zombie67** · 02-03-2009, 11:57 PM

Ah! And you are attacking a certain beta project the same way I am. Throw a GPU at it!

**gopher_yarrowzoo** · 02-04-2009, 04:18 AM

Zombie he probably is you know...
Goes to see if he can't do some work on via his GPU, probably not..

**Bok** · 02-04-2009, 07:47 AM

Originally Posted by zombie67

Ah! And you are attacking a certain beta project the same way I am. Throw a GPU at it!

Yes, seems more well behaved now than it did a month ago.

Pity there is no linux CUDA app as my other 3 9800GT's are all on linux boxen..

for tip on test apps for VTU !!

**Bok** · 02-04-2009, 07:56 AM

ummm, Superlink work too....

**KAMCOBILL** · 02-07-2009, 10:01 PM

I noticed the Archived Projects aren't in the 10, 25,50, 100k and etc. Is that suppose to happen?

**Bok** · 02-08-2009, 08:18 AM

no it's not.

**KAMCOBILL** · 02-09-2009, 05:51 PM

Originally Posted by Bok

no it's not.

OK Thanks Bok. My Predictor@Home isn't showing up in in Boinc Stats. Can you run them one more time to see if it'll be picked up?

**Bok** · 02-09-2009, 05:58 PM

Originally Posted by KAMCOBILL

OK Thanks Bok. My Predictor@Home isn't showing up in in Boinc Stats. Can you run them one more time to see if it'll be picked up?

Actally, first I may have misunderstood your previous question. The 10K, 100K etc is ONLY for boinc projects but will include all boinc projects including archived.

As for Predictor, it looks like you have a different cross-project ID in Predictor. Did you use a different email address perhaps?

Of course with no way to change it now that Predictor is dead, I'd be happy to fix it for you within my database.

Let me know if that's what you want...

Bok

p.s.I found it by doing a search

**KAMCOBILL** · 02-10-2009, 01:33 AM

OK. That'll work.

It was one of the projects that I had see-sawing with. I fixed it, now and that's why I was wondering if an update would fix it in this database. It' the right CPID on the Predictor site now (Cross-project ID: b65b36154e3a49f636a3148d4e0b3c83). I attached again after BOINCManager detached me. Now it's ok.

Changing it in database will work if it's ok with you. no hurry, just whem you have extra time

Thanks

Bill

**Bok** · 02-10-2009, 07:54 AM

Done.

Please note that if Predictor ever comes back and updates their xml it will overwrite any changes...Doesn't look likely though!

Bok

**KAMCOBILL** · 02-10-2009, 03:07 PM

Thanks Bok. It's in there now.

It doesn't seem to be inactive. Before it wasn't showing the updates when computers were connecting. Now, it's updating them and I was able to change my CPID to the correct one, there a couple of days ago.

Thread: Bok's 100K thread

Thread Tools

Rate This Thread

Display

Posting Permissions