Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 41 to 80 of 116

Thread: Help me test the new client

  1. #41
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    I see the stats showing up at SOB

    Indeed, here is what the web page shows.
    PHP Code:
    ID     Number                      Assigned             Last Reported                           Progress     Percent        cEMs/s
    970360  24737
    •2^13286191+1      Sun Feb 22 03:32:32 2009      Sun Feb 22 20:37:42 2009      16          0 %          6158527 
    I'm at 16% across the board... and doing iterations of .025 sec

    But, looking good so far!

    Using VISTA 64 bit

  2. #42
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    I just changed how much memory it could use to 4000MB
    Checked prime.txt and saw my username missing, stopped, added my name back in, and started the client up.

  3. #43
    If I am reading your stats correctly, then the 16 percent complete is getting put under the progress column? That would explain my 2's and 1's that show up in my progress column, since the last time Prime95 sent updates, I was at 2 and 1% on all my tests...

  4. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by enderak View Post
    It should show up in your stats once the test is completed. The first test I completed did at least.

    Louie,
    It looks like there's still some bugs with the tests pending page getting progress updates. All of my Prime95 tests show a progress of only 1 or 2 iterations and a cEMs/s of about 1.5M when they should be closer to 4-5M each.

    Yes, the stats should even show up before it is completed now. And I fixed the stats so progress will have the ( * n / 100.0) term correctly added. The client doesn't report the exact iteration like SB but that estimate should be good and give proper percents now for unfinished tests.

    Are the cEMs really wrong? I copied the cEM calculation code out of the current SB server. Let me know if I should look into it further or if it was just confusion with the progress numbers being wrong.

    Cheers,
    Louie

  5. #45
    Quote Originally Posted by woolysheep View Post
    Complete new install and still it doesn't show up in the pending test under my username.

    local.txt
    Thanks for all your testing. First off, your config files are perfect and so this isn't your fault.

    But, the linux client is violating my assumption that a client always sends a computer update before requesting work... an assumption which was validated by all other clients. I thought I had code in place to force the client to send this update in the event the guid / username wasn't in the database, but looking at my code now, it looks like that code would only execute if the database query failed, not if it were empty... doh!

    So I've fixed that. You should be able to just erase your worktodo file and restart it. Please email your full prime.log file after you try this whether it works or fails. lhelm (at) seventeenorbust.com

    Cheers,
    Louie

  6. #46
    No problem, I like to help

    But the good news is, what you did worked, the test that were downloaded are now assigned to my username at the pending test page.

  7. #47
    Everything looks good now. I think the low cEMs were because I had forgotten that I suspended the testing for a while.

    Thank you for all your work, Louie - it looks like this is shaping up to be a good alternative to the SoB client.

    Quote Originally Posted by jjjjL View Post
    Yes, the stats should even show up before it is completed now. And I fixed the stats so progress will have the ( * n / 100.0) term correctly added. The client doesn't report the exact iteration like SB but that estimate should be good and give proper percents now for unfinished tests.

    Are the cEMs really wrong? I copied the cEM calculation code out of the current SB server. Let me know if I should look into it further or if it was just confusion with the progress numbers being wrong.

    Cheers,
    Louie

  8. #48
    Can a few of you let your tests complete? Since these are all second pass tests, I want to match up some residues and make sure they correlate with past results and are being stored well.

    Keep up feedback on benchmarks and errors too. It's interesting to learn what the best settings for multi-core machines are.

    Cheers,
    Louie

  9. #49
    Quote Originally Posted by jjjjL View Post
    Can a few of you let your tests complete?
    I wouldn't mind finishing a couple of tests, but this poor laptop has heat dissipation issues, so I have to use the Throttle=50 setting in prime.txt to keep it running. It could take some time to finish. Currently at 5.27% and 3.27%. Also note that I'm not seeing any pending tests, I suppose I reserved too early. Running linux 64 bit. Should I release my current tests and talk to the server again?

  10. #50
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    I'm at 33% and intend to complete them if nothing goes wrong.

  11. #51
    When I am using SoB (the old client) I normally use SBqueue to give work to them (this because of offline pc's)
    Does mprime has its own way to buffer in offline (which I suppose)
    Just a question that popped into my head because I suppose mprime asks in a different way "tests" than old SoB client does.

    I understand that maybe this doesn't have priority, but just to mention it, in case of later development.
    Last edited by woolysheep; 02-23-2009 at 12:56 PM.

  12. #52
    mprime/prime95 queues up as many days of work as you tell it to.

    if you run ./mprime -m and choose 14. Options/Preferences you can choose, among other things, "days of work to queue up".

  13. #53
    Ah oke, that's good, thanks.

    But what if I have an offline PC, and I want to export work from an online client to an offline client. Is that possible?

  14. #54
    Quote Originally Posted by undoc.txt
    If you want to run the program on several machines this is typically done
    by carrying the program and files around on portable media such as a floppy
    or USB memory stick. In this case, you need to defeat the program's
    automatic detection of hardware changes. To do this, in prime.txt set
    FixedHardwareUID=1
    This is perhaps what you need.

  15. #55
    Quote Originally Posted by jjjjL View Post
    Can a few of you let your tests complete? Since these are all second pass tests, I want to match up some residues and make sure they correlate with past results and are being stored well.

    Keep up feedback on benchmarks and errors too. It's interesting to learn what the best settings for multi-core machines are.
    Louie,

    If you haven't already, you can check my first test, 10223*2^13272329+1

    On my i7, it looks like running 8 workers, 1 cpu each, I get an average of 0.053 sec/iter each (0.0066 sec/iter overall), which is almost exactly the same as 4 workers, 2 cpu's each (0.0065 sec/iter overall).

  16. #56
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Flensburg, Germany
    Posts
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by jjjjL View Post
    Can a few of you let your tests complete? Since these are all second pass tests, I want to match up some residues and make sure they correlate with past results and are being stored well.
    I'va also reserved an early test (n=12011981) that is not listed on my pending-test-site. But I've finished almost 80 % of it. So I will continue with this test.

    jimmy

  17. #57
    Any idea how to run it as service under windows ? The readme says:
    Checking the "Start at Bootup" menu choice will run prime95 as a service
    that starts when your computer boots up
    But i cannot find the option in the app.

    Anyhow.. thanks for the update, I was realy scared that this project was heading to a slow death..

  18. #58
    Quote Originally Posted by DukeBox View Post
    But i cannot find the option in the app.
    it's at the bottom of the options menu.

  19. #59
    There still seems to be some problem with the PrimeNet user id being erased when doing a manual communication (and, I assume, the daily automatic communication). It does not happen every time, maybe 1/2 the time or so.

    If you check your logs around 15:45 AKST (which I think would be 18:45 your time if you are in Texas) you should see a bunch of completion date updates from me, which may shed some light on the problem. The is no indication in my Prime95 logs of any problem... Let me know if I can do anything else to help track down this error.

  20. #60
    Quote Originally Posted by enderak View Post
    There still seems to be some problem with the PrimeNet user id being erased when doing a manual communication (and, I assume, the daily automatic communication). It does not happen every time, maybe 1/2 the time or so.

    If you check your logs around 15:45 AKST (which I think would be 18:45 your time if you are in Texas) you should see a bunch of completion date updates from me, which may shed some light on the problem. The is no indication in my Prime95 logs of any problem... Let me know if I can do anything else to help track down this error.
    This happened all the time a couple days ago. However, I wasn't aware it was still possible to get your userid erased. Send me your log file. lhelm (at) seventeenorbust.com

    Cheers,
    Louie

  21. #61
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    Does it to mine to. I'll try to catch it next time and send you the log file as well.

  22. #62
    Quote Originally Posted by IronBits View Post
    Does it to mine to. I'll try to catch it next time and send you the log file as well.
    I completely changed how the server handles username updates. I managed to reproduce the lost username error on my system, change the server, and can't reproduce it anymore. I think it's fixed.

    Let me know if see this again.


    Cheers,
    Louie

  23. #63
    Quote Originally Posted by KriZp View Post
    it's at the bottom of the options menu.
    There is no option like that.. only start at logon.

  24. #64
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    Is there an option to tell it to contact the server more than once per day?
    I'd like to update every 1 or 2 hours...

  25. #65
    Quote Originally Posted by DukeBox View Post
    There is no option like that.. only start at logon.
    You need to make sure you have admin rights to see the "Start at Bootup" features. If you are using Vista, that option no longer works, and you need to download one of the special NT service versions:

    32bit: ftp://mersenne.org/gimps/winnt258.zip
    64bit: ftp://mersenne.org/gimps/win64nt258.zip

  26. #66
    Why not just stick a shortcut in your Startup menu?

    And the user id problem seems to be fixed now, Louie. Thank you.

  27. #67
    IronBits:
    It looks like the time between updates is hard-coded to be in days in the source code, so the smallest unit of time you can specify is 1 day.

    If we end up forking Prime95 for use with SoB, it would easy to change it to use minutes or hours instead of days (or simply modify it to allow something like 0.1 days).

  28. #68
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    That would be perfect in hours. .1 or .2 or .3 ...
    For now, not a big deal, put it on the wish list

  29. #69
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Flensburg, Germany
    Posts
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by jjjjL View Post
    Keep up feedback on benchmarks and errors too. It's interesting to learn what the best settings for multi-core machines are.
    I' ve done some benchmark-tests. Some values are not logical. Perhaps someone have an idea. I run each test about 15 minutes on my Core2 Quad CPU Q6600 2.40 GHz, Vista 32 bit. Are 15 minutes too short to get comparable values?



    SB v.2.5.0, 1 client, transmit intermediate blocks: yes
    n = 12620926
    19:02:51 n.high = 1569
    19:17:09 n.high = 26673 ==> 0,0366 sec/Iter


    SB v.2.5.08, 1 client, transmit intermediate blocks: yes
    n = 12758729
    19:25:15 n.high = 1535
    19:39:58 n.high = 27630 ==> 0,0338 sec/Iter


    SB v.2.5.08, 1 client, transmit intermediate blocks: no
    n = 12758729
    19:49:03 n.high = 7375
    20:06:03 n.high = 32450 ==> 0,0407 sec/Iter
    .......slower than "transmit intermediate blocks: yes"? So I repeated the test:
    SB v.2.5.08, 1 client, transmit intermediate blocks: no
    n = 13316585
    20:54:04 n.high = 1409
    21:09:29 n.high = 25362 ==> 0,0386 sec/Iter


    SB v.2.5.08, 4 clients, transmit intermediate blocks: yes
    n = 13016525
    20:09:30 n.high = 1475
    20:24:06 n.high = 19175 ==> 0,0495 sec/Iter
    n = 13309097
    20:10:07 n.high = 1411
    20:24:23 n.high = 14110 ==> 0,0674 sec/Iter
    n = 13315711
    20:10:29 n.high = 1409
    20:23:45 n.high = 12681 ==> 0,0706 sec/Iter
    n = 13315774
    20:10:37 n.high = 1409
    20:23:45 n.high = 12681 ==> 0,0699 sec/Iter
    .......=> Overall rate: (0,0495+0,0674+0,0706+0,0699)/4 /4 = 0,0161 sec/Iter


    SB v.2.5.08, 4 clients, transmit intermediate blocks: no
    n = 13316285
    20:30:54 n.high = 1409
    20:48:16 n.high = 22544 ==> 0,0493 sec/Iter
    n = 13316350
    20:31:06 n.high = 1409
    20:47:37 n.high = 21135 ==> 0,0502 sec/Iter
    n = 13316527
    20:31:19 n.high = 1409
    20:47:31 n.high = 19726 ==> 0,0531 sec/Iter
    n = 13316554
    20:31:29 n.high = 1409
    20:47:46 n.high = 19726 ==> 0,0533 sec/Iter
    .......=> Overall rate: (0,0493+0,0502+0,0531+0,0533)/4 /4 = 0,0129 sec/Iter


    Prime 95 v.25.9 build 3, 1 worker, 1 CPU/worker, Run on any CPU
    n = 13316787 .......... ==> 0,0380 sec/Iter


    Prime 95 v.25.9 build 3, 1 worker, 4 CPU/worker, Run on any CPU
    n = 13316863 .......... ==> 0,0220 sec/Iter


    Prime 95 v.25.9 build 3, 4 workers, 1 CPU/worker, Smart assignment
    n = 13317068 .......... ==> 0,0473 sec/Iter
    n = 13317106 .......... ==> 0,0488 sec/Iter
    n = 13317449 .......... ==> 0,0470 sec/Iter
    n = 13317511 .......... ==> 0,0477 sec/Iter
    .......=> Overall rate: (0,0473+0,0488+0,0470+0,0477)/4 /4 = 0,0119 sec/Iter


    Prime 95 v.25.9 build 3, 4 workers, 1 CPU/worker, Run on any CPU
    n = 13317607 .......... ==> 0,0478 sec/Iter
    n = 13317629 .......... ==> 0,0467 sec/Iter
    n = 13317703 .......... ==> 0,0472 sec/Iter
    n = 13317737 .......... ==> 0,0464 sec/Iter
    .......=> Overall rate: (0,0478+0,0467+0,0472+0,0464)/4 /4 = 0,0118 sec/Iter


    jimmy

  30. #70
    More good news. I figured out how to assign P-1 factoring work through our custom primenet server.

    After a few kinks were worked out, I even have it storing the results in the database when they are completed too! And it gives credit for completing 2 tests in the form of cems now.

    There are a couple minor bumps in the road to rolling this out as mainstream though. There is a one-line bug in the Prime95 code that prevents optimal P-1 factoring from being executed before a PRP test. It's simple to fix and I'm sure George Woltman will want to correct it once I show him. We've been corresponding and he's busy til March so this can wait til then.

    But if this were changed in (a possible) v26.0 or v29.55 of Prime95, that would be sweet. Then we could automatically have the P-1 tests done right before a test and the need to do separate P-1 testing would be diminished. I realize we'd be giving up a little bit by not always having computers with high mem to do it, but that's a small edge to give up in exchange for always doing at least some P-1 testing.

    System wide, this would give us a 3% efficiency boost or so.

    Cheers,
    Louie

  31. #71
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    Excellent news!
    I finished those work units and it rolled right on into the next without any problems.

    It would be nice if this table could be updated: http://www.seventeenorbust.com/stats/byOS.mhtml

    Adding in XP 64bit as well as Vista 32 and 64bit.
    And while you are there, you might as well plug in Windows 7

  32. #72
    That's great news! Perhaps he would be willing to also modify it to allow < 1 day update intervals. I believe all it would take is changing a couple lines in commonc.c and commonc.h to change the DAYS_BETWEEN_CHECKINS variable to a float and one line to allow it to have values < 1.

    I also finished 4 tests this morning using Prime95. (None prime - shucks!) Entires from results.txt are below.

    UID: enderak, 55459*2^13285954+1 is not prime. RES64: C0225A46C9E9434A. Wd4: A948BD95,00000000, AID: 000000000000000000000000000ECE72
    UID: enderak, 55459*2^13285786+1 is not prime. RES64: AD3FF9FBC307A98C. Wd4: A7F8BC45,00000000, AID: 000000000000000000000000000ECE70
    UID: enderak, 55459*2^13285714+1 is not prime. RES64: 3C78FD863D818BDC. Wd4: A768BBB5,00000000, AID: 000000000000000000000000000ECE6E
    UID: enderak, 24737*2^13285471+1 is not prime. RES64: 7E209083A58982B0. Wd4: A582B9CF,00000000, AID: 000000000000000000000000000ECE6B

  33. #73
    2 updates:

    1) I added new first-pass tests into SB's queue. The test server for the new client is going to pull tests from this too, although, they will be a bit higher n values than the rest of the network is starting at.

    2) I enabled a nifty feature that allows the primenet server to signal clients that work is no longer needed. This will be useful for when we find the next prime... I'll be able to immediately cancel out all work for that k value, even ongoing tests.


    Anyway, to test #1 and #2, instead of waiting for a prime, I'm just telling all your clients to no longer test your current assignments and to get new, first-pass tests right now. Someone post me a log report of this happening to your client. Or let me know if anything goes haywire.

    I think change #1 is going to greatly increase our chances of finding a prime soon and #2 is going to be a nice bonus when it happens.

    Cheers,
    Louie

  34. #74
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    Worked as advertised, schweet!

  35. #75
    Worked here too. Log is below. Had to manually expire the old tests on the website - not sure if this little thing is worth bothering with though.

    PHP Code:
    [Sun Mar 01 08:09:19 2009 ver 25.9]
    Updating computer information on the server
    URL
    http://www.seventeenorbust.com/v5server/?v=0.95&px=GIMPS&t=uc&g=13eb7d72568d7545a05242d8510cad54&hg=f265e46cf94178f7d658297482f04166&wg=acbc0c3d4c0859d102ae38294b75086c&a=Windows64,Prime95,v25.9,build+3&c=Intel(R)+Core(TM)+i7+CPU+++++++++965++@+3.20GHz&f=Prefetch,SSE,SSE2,SSE4&L1=32&L2=256&np=4&hp=2&m=12285&s=3238&h=24&r=1024&L3=8192&ss=41&sh=0267B8AC07F993B5B1DEE0FA38DB3A0A
    RESPONSE:
    pnErrorResult=0
    pnErrorDetail
    =SUCCESS
    g
    =13eb7d72568d7545a05242d8510cad54
    u
    =enderak
    un
    =enderak
    =END=


    Sending expected completion date for 10223*2^13285529+1Mar 03 2009
    URL
    http://www.seventeenorbust.com/v5server/?v=0.95&px=GIMPS&t=ap&g=13eb7d72568d7545a05242d8510cad54&k=000000000000000000000000000ECE6C&stage=PRP&c=0&p=60.4786&d=86400&e=184938&ss=18467&sh=F4FB4AFECB268C579ED64EE873CA7AD0
    RESPONSE:
    pnErrorResult=47
    pnErrorDetail
    =ERROR_WORK_NO_LONGER_NEEDED
    =END=


    PrimeNet error 47Unknown error code
    ERROR_WORK_NO_LONGER_NEEDED
    Sending expected completion date 
    for 55459*2^13285594+1Mar 06 2009
    URL
    http://www.seventeenorbust.com/v5server/?v=0.95&px=GIMPS&t=ap&g=13eb7d72568d7545a05242d8510cad54&k=000000000000000000000000000ECE6D&c=0&p=0.0000&d=86400&e=423024&ss=6334&sh=DDCB1AF77DE1DCBDC20C2A5C7195AB8E
    RESPONSE:
    pnErrorResult=47
    pnErrorDetail
    =ERROR_WORK_NO_LONGER_NEEDED
    =END=


    PrimeNet error 47Unknown error code
    ERROR_WORK_NO_LONGER_NEEDED
    Getting assignment from server
    URL
    http://www.seventeenorbust.com/v5server/?v=0.95&px=GIMPS&t=ga&g=13eb7d72568d7545a05242d8510cad54&c=0&ss=26500&sh=C5ECFAB5AD716980EEBCA8EF3251639D
    RESPONSE:
    pnErrorResult=0
    pnErrorDetail
    =SUCCESS
    k
    =000000000000000000000000000ED3DF
    w
    =150
    A
    =24737
    b
    =2
    n
    =16000423
    c
    =1
    sf
    =54.0
    saved
    =2.5
    =END=


    Got assignment 000000000000000000000000000ED3DFPRP 24737*2^16000423+1
    Sending expected completion date 
    for 24737*2^16000423+1Mar 07 2009
    URL
    http://www.seventeenorbust.com/v5server/?v=0.95&px=GIMPS&t=ap&g=13eb7d72568d7545a05242d8510cad54&k=000000000000000000000000000ED3DF&c=0&p=0.0000&d=86400&e=563569&ss=19169&sh=1E88E88AF7DF85E4E3ECA95AD26F54D2
    RESPONSE:
    pnErrorResult=0
    pnErrorDetail
    =SUCCESS
    =END=


    Sending expected completion date for 21181*2^13285772+1Mar 03 2009
    URL
    http://www.seventeenorbust.com/v5server/?v=0.95&px=GIMPS&t=ap&g=13eb7d72568d7545a05242d8510cad54&k=000000000000000000000000000ECE6F&stage=PRP&c=1&p=64.0264&d=86400&e=152179&ss=15724&sh=A20DEEDE3EA3033EF4AEF4EDB0BF81D1
    RESPONSE:
    pnErrorResult=47
    pnErrorDetail
    =ERROR_WORK_NO_LONGER_NEEDED
    =END=


    PrimeNet error 47Unknown error code
    ERROR_WORK_NO_LONGER_NEEDED
    Getting assignment from server
    URL
    http://www.seventeenorbust.com/v5server/?v=0.95&px=GIMPS&t=ga&g=13eb7d72568d7545a05242d8510cad54&c=1&ss=11478&sh=A319A5625A9D460108CCD077714B9A77
    RESPONSE:
    pnErrorResult=0
    pnErrorDetail
    =SUCCESS
    k
    =000000000000000000000000000ED3E0
    w
    =150
    A
    =10223
    b
    =2
    n
    =16000457
    c
    =1
    sf
    =54.0
    saved
    =2.5
    =END=


    Got assignment 000000000000000000000000000ED3E0PRP 10223*2^16000457+1
    Sending expected completion date 
    for 10223*2^16000457+1Mar 07 2009
    URL
    http://www.seventeenorbust.com/v5server/?v=0.95&px=GIMPS&t=ap&g=13eb7d72568d7545a05242d8510cad54&k=000000000000000000000000000ED3E0&c=1&p=0.0000&d=86400&e=563570&ss=29358&sh=263B1DF155A2BDBB1820F9D3DF1210F8
    RESPONSE:
    pnErrorResult=0
    pnErrorDetail
    =SUCCESS
    =END=


    Sending expected completion date for 24737*2^13285903+1Mar 03 2009
    URL
    http://www.seventeenorbust.com/v5server/?v=0.95&px=GIMPS&t=ap&g=13eb7d72568d7545a05242d8510cad54&k=000000000000000000000000000ECE71&stage=PRP&c=2&p=63.2127&d=86400&e=155622&ss=26962&sh=A83F28A500F076ADD56038343B61E4DB
    RESPONSE:
    pnErrorResult=47
    pnErrorDetail
    =ERROR_WORK_NO_LONGER_NEEDED
    =END=


    PrimeNet error 47Unknown error code
    ERROR_WORK_NO_LONGER_NEEDED
    Getting assignment from server
    URL
    http://www.seventeenorbust.com/v5server/?v=0.95&px=GIMPS&t=ga&g=13eb7d72568d7545a05242d8510cad54&c=2&ss=24464&sh=1AA0F3A6B0100859328034157AAFB815
    RESPONSE:
    pnErrorResult=0
    pnErrorDetail
    =SUCCESS
    k
    =000000000000000000000000000ED3E1
    w
    =150
    A
    =22699
    b
    =2
    n
    =16000534
    c
    =1
    sf
    =54.0
    saved
    =2.5
    =END=


    Got assignment 000000000000000000000000000ED3E1PRP 22699*2^16000534+1
    Sending expected completion date 
    for 22699*2^16000534+1Mar 07 2009
    URL
    http://www.seventeenorbust.com/v5server/?v=0.95&px=GIMPS&t=ap&g=13eb7d72568d7545a05242d8510cad54&k=000000000000000000000000000ED3E1&c=2&p=0.0000&d=86400&e=563573&ss=5705&sh=83B70DA8BAFB90682C2001CC181C7757
    RESPONSE:
    pnErrorResult=0
    pnErrorDetail
    =SUCCESS
    =END=


    Sending expected completion date for 10223*2^13285961+1Mar 03 2009
    URL
    http://www.seventeenorbust.com/v5server/?v=0.95&px=GIMPS&t=ap&g=13eb7d72568d7545a05242d8510cad54&k=000000000000000000000000000ECE73&stage=PRP&c=3&p=61.4428&d=86400&e=180432&ss=28145&sh=B0BDD0114C9DCE63059942A187EDB07F
    RESPONSE:
    pnErrorResult=47
    pnErrorDetail
    =ERROR_WORK_NO_LONGER_NEEDED
    =END=


    PrimeNet error 47Unknown error code
    ERROR_WORK_NO_LONGER_NEEDED
    Getting assignment from server
    URL
    http://www.seventeenorbust.com/v5server/?v=0.95&px=GIMPS&t=ga&g=13eb7d72568d7545a05242d8510cad54&c=3&ss=23281&sh=EA25579F78B4C74EE87AC1285A493B91
    RESPONSE:
    pnErrorResult=0
    pnErrorDetail
    =SUCCESS
    k
    =000000000000000000000000000ED3E2
    w
    =150
    A
    =24737
    b
    =2
    n
    =16000591
    c
    =1
    sf
    =54.0
    saved
    =2.5
    =END=


    Got assignment 000000000000000000000000000ED3E2PRP 24737*2^16000591+1
    Sending expected completion date 
    for 24737*2^16000591+1Mar 07 2009
    URL
    http://www.seventeenorbust.com/v5server/?v=0.95&px=GIMPS&t=ap&g=13eb7d72568d7545a05242d8510cad54&k=000000000000000000000000000ED3E2&c=3&p=0.0000&d=86400&e=563575&ss=16827&sh=1922280242BAE358DACF839EEAA0932B
    RESPONSE:
    pnErrorResult=0
    pnErrorDetail
    =SUCCESS
    =END

  36. #76
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    That happened to me to and I didn't think to check. Good catch!

    I received 6 new work units assigned, but I only have 4 worker windows. ?

  37. #77
    Under the Options>Preferences menu, what is your "Days of work to queue up" set to? The default I think is 5, but I set mine at 1 to prevent checking out tests way ahead of time. I think you could also set it at 0 to not check any out until you submit your current tests.

  38. #78
    I was wondering why it had aborted all of my tests! It works this end!



  39. #79
    I've put some linux x64 systems systems online (in total 0.2THz) all seems to work fine. Hope they update this evening so I can see some stats soon .

  40. #80
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    It was set to one day. I have changed it to 0 as you suggested.
    I'll be back working on this project in a week or two.
    Hopefully more features will be worked in and bugs worked out by then.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •