Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: New Via in1's are worth it.

  1. #1
    Senior Member dmbrubac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Posts
    112

    Thumbs up New Via in1's are worth it.

    I just upgraded to Via 4in1 ver 4.45 from 4.43 and saw a 12% increase in cEMs/sec on a dual P3 Tualatin @ 1.33 Ghz.

    75809 to 85117

    For all you Via chipset users, get them at
    http://www.viaarena.com/?PageID=2

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    76
    Wow. Seems to have worked for me. 54k --> 62k cEM/s. Athlon 1.2+w2k

    Then, enabling 4-way ram interleave in bios got me up to 65k.
    Last edited by dudlio; 12-15-2002 at 02:02 AM.

  3. #3

    Smile

    Yeah, wow. Good find. I was a little skeptical when I saw this post and thought maybe it was a fluke. I just installed the 4-in-1 drivers on my 1.33GHz Athlon box and had an increase from 64-->70kcEMs. Very nice.

    I already had the 4 way interleaving on so maybe that's why I didn't gain as much. In any case, I'd definately recommend upgrading if you have a VIA chipset.

    -Louie

  4. #4
    I also got a similar increase. I'm wondering what exactly they changed to get so much performance boost.

  5. #5
    The Intel Application Accelerator does the same thing...

    http://arstechnica.infopop.net/OpenT...635#6690916635

  6. #6

    Re: New Via in1's are worth it.

    Originally posted by dmbrubac
    I just upgraded to Via 4in1 ver 4.45 from 4.43 and saw a 12% increase in cEMs/sec on a dual P3 Tualatin @ 1.33 Ghz.

    75809 to 85117

    For all you Via chipset users, get them at
    http://www.viaarena.com/?PageID=2
    I believe the *all* portion is not quite correct. On the page they're talking
    about Kt400 users. I have Apollo Pro 133A, and for me the new drivers did nothing.

    Igor

  7. #7

    Re: Re: New Via in1's are worth it.

    Originally posted by igor
    I believe the *all* portion is not quite correct. On the page they're talking
    about Kt400 users. I have Apollo Pro 133A, and for me the new drivers did nothing.

    Igor
    My windows machine is running on an MSI 6330 Lite board, based on VIA KT133. It's a low-end, DDR266 board running an Athlon TBird at 1400, but those new Via drivers did boost performance by about 15%. With that kind of gain, it's worth trying, even if it doesn't produce any gains on a particular system.

  8. #8

    Re: Re: Re: New Via in1's are worth it.

    Originally posted by shifted
    My windows machine is running on an MSI 6330 Lite board, based on VIA KT133. It's a low-end, DDR266 board running an Athlon TBird at 1400, but those new Via drivers did boost performance by about 15%. With that kind of gain, it's worth trying, even if it doesn't produce any gains on a particular system.
    So different chipset and different CPU manufacturer from what I have. Either of two could explain why you see the improvement and I don't.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Haverhill, MA
    Posts
    76
    i'm using a totally different mobo and processor
    MSI K7T266 Pro
    MS-6380
    w/ Athlon XP 1900+ @1728mhz
    1gb DDR Ram
    and my performance increase was about 15%

  10. #10
    Senior Member dmbrubac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Posts
    112
    Maybe 'all' isn't 100% accurate, but it seems 95% is, so.....

    It's too bad they didn't work for you - they've been quite stable and well worth it for me. Perhaps you have some BIOS settings holding you back, or perhaps you are using the Intel app referred to previously. I have no experience with this one, so I am taking the post at face value.

    BTW I am using them on an MSI Pro266TD Master (Apollo Pro 266T Chipset)

    Merry Christmas!

  11. #11
    An easy overclock to try is changing the CAS setting in the bios from 3 to 2. This reduces access latency a little bit. Most memory will take it, but it may be unstable with cheap ram (expensive stuff is often rated for 2); however, I've done it on two machines with no decrease in stability, and a couple percent increase in performance. I recommend it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •