Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 121 to 160 of 181

Thread: Call for Benchmarks

  1. #121
    Boinc'ing away
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    982
    Originally posted by Grumpy
    Here is my Dual 2400 MP

    Summary
    -------
    Usr time Sys time
    -------- --------
    Maketrj 9.266 0.484
    Foldtraj 59.859 11.875

    My Dual 2400MP (@2600+ speeds):

    Code:
    Summary
    -------
              Usr time  Sys time
              --------  --------
    Maketrj      8.016     0.500
    Foldtraj    58.078    11.531
    Not much difference...

  2. #122
    OCworkbench Stats Ho
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    519
    I run Win 2 K Prioity 0
    I am not a Stats Ho, it is just more satisfying to see that my numbers are better than yours.

  3. #123
    7G - OCW iggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    156
    Barton @ 2226 MHz, WinXP:
    Code:
              Usr time  Sys time
              --------  --------
    Maketrj      5.984     0.203
    Foldtraj    34.234     5.906
    AXP1700+ @2205 MHz:
    Code:
              Usr time  Sys time
              --------  --------
    Maketrj      6.703    0.391
    Foldtraj    36.234    5.859
    AXP2000+ (1667 MHz), Win2K3:
    Code:
              Usr time  Sys time
              --------  --------
    Maketrj      9.859     0.594
    Foldtraj    59.813     9.344
    AXP2000+ (1667MHz), Knoppix 3.3:
    Code:
              Usr time  Sys time
              --------  --------
    Maketrj      4.850     1.010
    Foldtraj    56.470     17.800

  4. #124
    2100+ oced to 2600+
    2139 (186*11.5)

    Maketraj Usr Time = 7.078
    Maketraj Sys Time = .422
    Foldtraj Usr Time = 37.641
    Foldtraj Sys Time = 6.719
    Driving home the sky accelerates and the clouds all form a geometric shape.

  5. #125
    Opteron 146 @ 2 GHz
    Summary
    -------
    Usr time / Sys time
    -------- --------
    Maketrj 5.672 / 1.031

    Foldtraj 28.719 / 4.641

  6. #126
    Intel P4 CPU 2.60GHz, 800MHz FSB
    Linux 2.4.23

    Usr time Sys time
    -------- --------
    Maketrj 2.590 0.610
    Foldtraj 28.330 9.620

  7. #127
    Athlon 64 3200+

    Mandrake 9.2 64bit

    Usr time / Sys time

    Maketrj 3.220 / 0.490

    Foldtraj 31.900 / 5.010

  8. #128
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    5

    Arrow Benchmarks

    AXP2500+ @ 2.4GHz with 200Mhz FSB (RAM sync w/ CAS2.0-2-2-11)
    WinXP Pro

    Summary
    -------
    Usr time / Sys time
    -------- / --------
    Maketrj 5.703 / 0.438
    Foldtraj 34.453 / 6.453

    ------------------------------

    AXP2500+ @ 2.5GHz with 200Mhz FSB (RAM sync w/ CAS2.0-2-2-11)
    WinXP Pro

    Summary
    -------
    Usr time / Sys time
    -------- / --------
    Maketrj 5.672 / 0.203
    Foldtraj 33.813 / 6.078

    -Lucus

  9. #129
    of OCW's "Triple Nickle" Gortok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    43
    Barton 2500+@2260 2x256 HyperX 3500@205 2.0-3-3-6 NF7-S v2

    One moment, opening rotamer library...
    Predicting secondary structure and generating trajectory distribution...
    Folding protein...
    Benchmark complete.

    Summary
    -------
    Usr time Sys time
    -------- --------
    Maketrj 6.266 0.953
    Foldtraj 34.609 6.688






  10. #130
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Mobile, AL
    Posts
    9
    AMD,Athlon XP, 2224,Win2K,6.578,1.141,37.188,8.234

  11. #131
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sc, USA
    Posts
    4
    Barton 2800 @ 2400mhz-10.5x228
    2x256 Corsair 11-2-2-2
    NF7 v2.0

    usr time system time

    Maketrj / 5.538 0.250
    Foldtraj / 31.976 4.717
    Last edited by AAdjuster; 01-09-2004 at 02:13 PM.

  12. #132
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    England, near Europe
    Posts
    211
    AMD FX-51, 1GB Corsair XMS3200RPT - completely stock (for now ). WinXP Pro SP1


    Summary
    -------
    Usr time Sys time
    -------- --------
    Maketrj 5.266 0.219
    Foldtraj 26.766 3.781
    Train hard, fight easy


  13. #133
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    5

    Talking Update

    Update:
    AXP2500+ @ 2.456GHz with 223Mhz FSB (RAM sync w/ CAS2.0-2-2-11)
    WinXP Pro

    Summary
    -------
    Usr time / Sys time
    -------- / --------
    Maketrj 5.508 / 0.250
    Foldtraj 32.627 / 5.708

    -Lucus

  14. #134

    A64 Overckocked

    Anyone got -bench results for an overlcocked A64 yet?

  15. #135
    OCworkbench Stats Ho
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    519
    I have seen a 3200 Athlon 64 OCed to more than 2.1 Ghz I believe it got something like..

    5.656_____ 0.141
    30.313____ 4.828

    I am not a Stats Ho, it is just more satisfying to see that my numbers are better than yours.

  16. #136

    bench

    AMD Tbird 1333 Mhz, Linux 2.4.21

    Usr time Sys time
    -------- --------
    Maketrj 8.260 0.520
    Foldtraj 75.340 11.080

  17. #137
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    England, near Europe
    Posts
    211
    FX51 @ 2.46GHz, WinXP Pro SP1, 1Gb Corsair Reg. PC3200:

    Code:
    Summary
    -------
              Usr time  Sys time
              --------  --------
    Maketrj      4.750     0.219
    Foldtraj    24.391     3.438
    Train hard, fight easy


  18. #138
    The Genome Collective gets the fastest cruncher

  19. #139
    One more...

    Opteron 144 running at 1.8GHz
    1GB PC3200 Reg. ECC Dual Channel RAM
    Windows Server 2003 AMD64


    Code:
              Usr time  Sys time
              --------  --------
    Maketrj      6.328     0.219
    Foldtraj    30.141     6.844
    Greg

  20. #140
    OCworkbench Stats Ho
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    519
    What Motherboard is that frmky

    Nice result
    I am not a Stats Ho, it is just more satisfying to see that my numbers are better than yours.

  21. #141
    It's an ASUS SK8V.

    I also tried the Linux version of the client. The ICC version gives a slower time for foldtraj:
    2.49 0.41
    35.95 5.08

    and the gcc version won't run since it depends on ncurses-4 I don't have a 32-bit version of it installed.

    Greg
    Last edited by frmky; 02-01-2004 at 03:25 PM.

  22. #142
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    MI, U.S.
    Posts
    697
    You can ln -s libncurses.so.5 libncurses.so.4 to use the gcc client, at least on a 32-bit system. I suppose that might not work on a 64-bit one, but I don't see why it wouldn't.

    If you have a working libncurses.so.5 for the icc version, you can just use it, in other words.
    "If you fail to adjust your notion of fairness to the reality of the Universe, you will probably not be happy."

    -- Originally posted by Paratima

  23. #143
    Yeah...that'll probably work once I figure out where the 32-bit libraries are stored. I've have a look at that later.
    Greg

  24. #144
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    MI, U.S.
    Posts
    697
    I think it's just plain /lib and /usr/lib. I think that /lib64 and /usr/lib64 are for the 64-bit libraries.

    However, I don't know for sure, since I have no Opteron / Athlon64 hardware.
    "If you fail to adjust your notion of fairness to the reality of the Universe, you will probably not be happy."

    -- Originally posted by Paratima

  25. #145
    /lib and /usr/lib are 64-bit, /lib32 and /usr/lib32 are the 32 bit libraries. I created the link and followed up with env-update, but it still claims it can't find libncurses.so.4. I checked to make sure those paths were in /etc/env.d, and they are. Even ran ldconfig manually just to make sure. Not sure what's up. Oh well...and I was hoping to break the 30 second barrier.

    BTW, I noticed that there are 64-bit binaries for a few other platforms. Is it a simple recompile? Are they faster than the 32-bit ones? If so, I'm willing to make my machine available to make linux-amd64 and freebsd-amd64 binaries.

    Greg

  26. #146
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    MI, U.S.
    Posts
    697
    Maybe /sbin/ldconfig?

    I'm not sure what env-update is supposed to do, nor am I sure what /etc/env.d is for; they sound like distro-magic tools to me. Though it's always possible that they're for glibc on x86-64...

    IIRC from the past, the DF people need a machine that they have physical access to before they can make binaries for that architecture. I don't remember why for sure, though...

    But I think that with one of them (Solaris or IRIX) the 32-bit and 64-bit versions are about the same speed anyway. No idea if the same will hold true on Intel, but it might.
    "If you fail to adjust your notion of fairness to the reality of the Universe, you will probably not be happy."

    -- Originally posted by Paratima

  27. #147
    Nope...still no go. I give up on it.

    OK..back on topic now....sorry about that!

  28. #148
    im having a strange problem...
    so the benchmark is completely independent of the current protein?
    the reason i ask this is because earlier in this thread i have posted some benches where my maketraj sys time was .422 (186x12) for my current setup or .359 running stock.

    well now i have some pc3200 and running a 2100+ at 200x10.5
    i benched and got some results basically on par with the results before.

    this past weekend i reformatted my hdd and reinstalled xp. everything is essentially the same, and now my maketraj sys time is well over 2 and the others have noticably slowed as well, im at the office right now but i got something like 2.xxx. i tried various ram timings and its all basically the same. right now i have found the timings 2.0-2-3-11 or 2.0-3-3-11 to give me the most memory bandwidth on the nforce2 chipset.

    im confused.
    Driving home the sky accelerates and the clouds all form a geometric shape.

  29. #149
    XP1800+
    256mb ddr
    Gentoo linux
    ICC client
    Note: 3 different kernels ran benchmark 3 time on each for accuracy

    Code:
                  Kernel 2.4.22
    		   
    		   Summary
                        -------
                  Usr time  Sys time
                  --------    --------
    Maketrj      5.960     0.510
    Foldtraj    72.220     9.010
    
                      Kernel 2.6.1
    
    		   Summary
    		   -------
                 Usr time  Sys time
                  --------  --------
    Maketrj      6.050     0.490
    Foldtraj    71.720    11.220
      
                       Kernel 2.62
    		   
                        Summary
                  Usr time        Sys time
                    --------             --------
    Maketrj      5.190             0.890
    Foldtraj      59.200            15.970

  30. #150
    kde 3.2 konsole uses 3-5% of cpu by using aterm instead I dropped times a little

    Code:
    Summary
    -------
              Usr time  Sys time
              --------  --------
    Maketrj      5.130     0.900
    Foldtraj    58.860    15.730

  31. #151
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Hamburg/Germany
    Posts
    386
    @ Bionic_Redneck
    buy another 256MB RAM ....

    My benches on an XP2800 using W2K, 512MB RAM @166Mhz:


    usr time: sys time:
    10.045 1.512
    54.759 9.854


    That's about a 4second difference....


    Greets Thor

  32. #152
    gonna ask a stupid question:
    whats these args ?
    Maketrj usr, Maketrj sys,Foldtr\
    aj usr, Foldtraj sys

    i see a lot of number there, how to get these numbers.
    thanks.

  33. #153
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    MI, U.S.
    Posts
    697
    You get those numbers by running ./foldtrajlite -bench (or .\foldtrajlite -bench on Windows).

    I'm not sure what the difference between Maketrj and Foldtraj is (I think the first one is what the client does at the end of a generation, and the second one is what the client does most of the time otherwise), but the difference between "usr" and "sys" time is that "sys" time is spent running kernel code (that the DF program calls). "usr" time is spent running code in the DF program itself.
    "If you fail to adjust your notion of fairness to the reality of the Universe, you will probably not be happy."

    -- Originally posted by Paratima

  34. #154
    OCworkbench Stats Ho
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    519
    Thor, that is a very slow result for your computer specs...did you have other stuff running at the time
    I am not a Stats Ho, it is just more satisfying to see that my numbers are better than yours.

  35. #155
    7G - OCW iggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    156
    Probably a typo - I guess it should have been AXP1800+...

  36. #156
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Hamburg/Germany
    Posts
    386
    Thats right, my mistake...it was late at night over here when I wrote that. 12hour learning session isn't any good for a brain
    But maybe I was just thinking again about getting myself a new XP2500 and wished there would be enough money for a 2800+
    But as always , students never ever have enough money...need a new job to be able to spend some money again

    Greets Thor

  37. #157
    OCworkbench Stats Ho
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    519
    :sleepy: Oops, sleep deprivation is evil....
    I am not a Stats Ho, it is just more satisfying to see that my numbers are better than yours.

  38. #158
    Ok Thor I was using ICC client switched to GCC

    Summary
    -------
    Usr time Sys time
    -------- --------
    Maketrj 6.010 0.890
    Foldtraj 52.470 15.720

  39. #159
    Xtremesystems Folder
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Columbus, U.S.A.
    Posts
    12
    So I'm seeing these numbers but would like to ask a question...

    If someone wanted to build a mini farm of folders for df, what would you guess would yield the most output...

    3x 2.4c @ 3.2 w/ ht on
    or
    5x amd 2500 or 2600+ at stock

    TIA

  40. #160
    HP PA-8500 (440Mhz)

    Summary
    -------
    Usr time Sys time
    -------- --------
    Maketrj 11.470 0.520
    Foldtraj 145.640 3.330


    HP PA-8700 (875Mhz)

    Summary
    -------
    Usr time Sys time
    -------- --------
    Maketrj 7.110 0.430
    Foldtraj 79.680 1.730

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •