Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 41

Thread: Protein update query

  1. #1
    Boinc'ing away
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    982

    Protein update query

    One of my PCs has just done gen 0 of the new protein and then stopped with :

    Code:
    ERROR: [001.009] {foldtrajlite2.c, line 5597} Error occured while aligning structures
    ERROR: [001.023] {rotate.c, line 677} iResCounts do not match 96 56
    ERROR: [001.010] {foldtrajlite2.c, line 5601} Abnormally small RMSD: 0.000000 (96 1 1)
    FATAL ERROR: [096.056] {foldtrajlite2.c, line 5608} Invalid/corrupt native structure, please download a fresh copy of the software
    Upon checking native.val it is still saying that the protein is 96 and not 56...I can't download a fresh install as the server times out...anyone experiencing this?

    /edit: both the Linux and Windows updates have native.val as 96...
    Last edited by pfb; 08-13-2003 at 05:49 PM.

  2. #2
    native.val should be 33202 bytes
    Both update packages have the new native.val in them as far as I can tell.
    Howard Feldman

  3. #3
    Fixer of Broken Things FoBoT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Holden MO
    Posts
    2,137
    looks like you have a corrupted update, probably just need to blow it up and start fresh

    good luck!
    Use the right tool for the right job!

  4. #4
    Boinc'ing away
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    982
    The native.val I have after the update is 58,181 bytes and a modified time/date of 13 August 2003, 2:12:06 PM - so I guess it's not right...

    Time to kick back and try and get a fresh Windows and Linux download from the server - not looking to good at the moment though as it keeps timing out

  5. #5
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    ========================[ Aug 13, 2003 3:26 PM ]========================
    ERROR: [001.001] {trajtools.c, line 3512} Unable to open trajectory distribution file handle_protein_1.trj
    FATAL ERROR: [002.003] {foldtrajlite2.c, line 5307} Unable to read trajectory distribution handle_protein_1, please create a new one

    This was a fresh manual download.
    I deleted filelist.txt, progress.txt and any work it had done, not much yet.
    Edit found 4 zombie foldtrajlite.ex running in task manager under XP - not sure how that happened, starting fresh again.

  6. #6
    Boinc'ing away
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    982
    I got that after the iResCounts error

    Still trying to get a fresh install down...

  7. #7
    So WTF is the deal this time? My whole team is hosed again. Not one person has uploaded since the update? Was it another botched auto update or what? I only see like two people putting up any numbers for the entire project!

    Not looking forward to coming home and finding 4 computers burning energy for nothing.....again....

    us users--> <-- D.F. staff

    To many smilies to work with.
    Crunchin D.F. for www.procooling.com

  8. #8
    Ancient Programmer Paratima's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    West Central Florida
    Posts
    3,296
    Originally posted by Brian the Fist
    native.val should be 33202 bytes
    Both update packages have the new native.val in them as far as I can tell.
    This means they got it right the second time around, cause the first zip file had a native.val file size of 58,181 bytes.
    So here we are, tryin to download again!

  9. #9
    Originally posted by Paratima
    This means they got it right the second time around, cause the first zip file had a native.val file size of 58,181 bytes.
    So here we are, tryin to download again!
    Ok, so in idiot terms this means the "auto" update was a failure for all and we have to download the "fixed" client?

    Be another 2 hours before I get home to the crunchers....
    Crunchin D.F. for www.procooling.com

  10. #10
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    Originally posted by Paratima
    This means they got it right the second time around, cause the first zip file had a native.val file size of 58,181 bytes.
    So here we are, tryin to download again!
    That would explain why every darn boxen I updated manually has failed miserably

  11. #11
    Ancient Programmer Paratima's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    West Central Florida
    Posts
    3,296
    Yup! AND ya can't get in now fer nuttin'.

    Well, hey, did you REALLY have anything better to do tonight?

  12. #12
    Boinc'ing away
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    982
    Argh!

    Just manged to get the full Linux package down (after an hour) and...



    and the just got the Windows full package:






  13. #13
    Originally posted by Paratima
    Yup! AND ya can't get in now fer nuttin'.

    Well, hey, did you REALLY have anything better to do tonight?
    Ummmmm...errrrr....well....no.
    Crunchin D.F. for www.procooling.com

  14. #14
    Ancient Programmer Paratima's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    West Central Florida
    Posts
    3,296
    AAAAARRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHH!

    I FINALLY got thru, downloaded the zip file & guess what?

    native.val = 58,181 bytes!!

    I going home. Start folding tomorrow. Plenty of time later. Nighty.

  15. #15
    Boinc'ing away
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    982
    The Windows screen-saver has the right native.val in it...



    /me goes off to test....
    Last edited by pfb; 08-13-2003 at 08:02 PM.

  16. #16
    Boinc'ing away
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    982
    well, using the native.val from the Windows screensaver seems to work...not sure Howard would be happy with that but I'll go with it until the main packages are updated...

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    New Jersey USA
    Posts
    115
    The Linux updates I got(Not the full tar.gz) seem to be the correct size 33k, still waiting to get through gen 0 to be sure all is working.
    The Windows client crashed on all my Windows systems though, they have the 58k file.

  18. #18
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Carbondale, Colorado, USA
    Posts
    18

    Re: Protein update query

    Originally posted by pfb
    One of my PCs has just done gen 0 of the new protein and then stopped with :

    Code:
    ERROR: [001.009] {foldtrajlite2.c, line 5597} Error occured while aligning structures
    ERROR: [001.023] {rotate.c, line 677} iResCounts do not match 96 56
    ERROR: [001.010] {foldtrajlite2.c, line 5601} Abnormally small RMSD: 0.000000 (96 1 1)
    FATAL ERROR: [096.056] {foldtrajlite2.c, line 5608} Invalid/corrupt native structure, please download a fresh copy of the software
    Upon checking native.val it is still saying that the protein is 96 and not 56...I can't download a fresh install as the server times out...anyone experiencing this?

    /edit: both the Linux and Windows updates have native.val as 96...
    I just got this exact same error on one of my systems. It had the auto update not manual. Trying again!

    Edit: Make that 2 system's 1 manual update and 1 auto!
    Last edited by Rbreb13; 08-13-2003 at 11:09 PM.
    www.hardcoreware.net

  19. #19
    I auto-updated about 1 1/2 hours ago (it's 7:36 pm Mountain Standard Time right now). And my native.val file is 33K.

    I must be the lucky one...

  20. #20
    Ancient Programmer Paratima's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    West Central Florida
    Posts
    3,296
    Thank you, pfb !

  21. #21
    Fixer of Broken Things FoBoT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Holden MO
    Posts
    2,137
    Originally posted by Paratima
    Thank you, pfb !
    i also grabbed a 33k native.val from the SS, thanks to pfb's post, thank you!

    i had just started installing to a new 23 PC/26 Ghz crack rack, only had done 3 installs when i read through this
    Use the right tool for the right job!

  22. #22
    Administrator PCZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Chertsey Surrey UK
    Posts
    2,428
    I just downloaded the linux client and the native.val is too big 58k ?

  23. #23
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    Originally posted by Paratima
    Thank you, pfb !
    What he said

    I just downloaded the client off the download page, it is still the wrong size native.val file

  24. #24
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    Originally posted by PCZ
    I just downloaded the linux client and the native.val is too big 58k ?
    ftp'd it from mine using binary mode.
    It working fine and the correct size to www.dbestern.com/native.val
    This runs fine under Mandrake 9.1+
    I would think native.val is the same across all platforms /me shrugs

  25. #25
    Administrator PCZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Chertsey Surrey UK
    Posts
    2,428
    Thanks IB that done the trick

  26. #26
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    I just got a reply from Howard.
    "Ok, thanks, I see now. I fixed them. strange..."
    All downloads should be good to go now!
    I checked the windows command line client - it is now correct!

  27. #27
    Looks like I got all my crunchers back up and my team is slowly following suit. Other than Gen 0 everything is twice as fast on my comps. My output is so far double. I also noticed rediculously low RMS already. Low 3's on the stats page.
    Crunchin D.F. for www.procooling.com

  28. #28
    Not here rsbriggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,400
    Sadly, every frigging client I installed with the any of the full client downloads has now bombed out.....

    Maybe I'll try to fix things tomorrow. Maybe not. I don't know at this point.
    FreeDC Mercenary


  29. #29
    Target Butt IronBits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Morrisville, NC
    Posts
    8,619
    Howard says: Get a fresh download and start clean

    Code:
    08/13/2003 
    
    - Our new protein is underway, we are now studying the folding 
    of Protein G, soon to be followed by Protein L. These are small, 
    well-characterized proteins that have been studied by other 
    methods, and this will allow us to compare our 'folding movies' to 
    other, more tried and tested studies of protein folding. 
    
    - Please note if you manually downloaded (not autoupdate) the 
    new client (NOT screensaver) before 11PM EST today, it seems 
    that the package still had the old native.val in it from the last 
    protein. Strangely its date stamp is current though so that's how 
    we managed to miss it. Not sure what happened but the 
    packages linked from the download page should have the correct 
    file now. If in doubt, or if you receive an error message about 
    being unable to compute RMSD, check - your native.val should 
    now be 33202 bytes if you have the latest client. Sorry for any 
    inconvenience.

  30. #30
    25/25Mbit is nearly enough :p pointwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    831
    So what happened to that "very thorough testing"?!

    You can't have tested it much when you didn't catch that error (the wrong native.val file)

    I'll not be surprised if we/you will loose *a lot* of participants because of this

    I have a client that had been offline since the start of this month. I started it yesterday a few times to see if it would update properly, but the ftp was overloaded. I then tried it again this morning and it downloaded the update (with the correct native.val), but it'll not run any longer

    Howard You got mail
    Pointwood
    Jabber ID: pointwood@jabber.shd.dk
    irc.arstechnica.com, #distributed

  31. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Oosterhout, Netherlands
    Posts
    223
    I have some offlines boxes yet to update. Should I try the autoupdate or just delete everything a start anew?
    Proud member of the Dutch Power Cows

  32. #32
    25/25Mbit is nearly enough :p pointwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    831
    Personally, I would see if the autoupdate works first.
    Pointwood
    Jabber ID: pointwood@jabber.shd.dk
    irc.arstechnica.com, #distributed

  33. #33
    We tested the auto-update and it worked fine for us. Anyone who did the auto-update should have received the correct native.val. If you did the auto-update and did not receive the correct native.val I cannot understand how at the moment.

    And yes, the 'fresh' packages had the incorrect file in them for a few hours, but we fixed it as soon as we learned of it. We do not explicitly try downloading the posted packages and running them prior to release (but rather just test our own local copies) which is how this packaging error was missed.
    Howard Feldman

  34. #34
    25/25Mbit is nearly enough :p pointwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    831
    /me gets another idea

    Betatesting has been discussed before and this is yet another suggestion

    Since it is not really possible to setup a test server so we could test new releases before they were released, I'm thinking of doing it differently. When we change to a new protein, it's possible to upload "old" data for the next 48 hours. Why not use part of that time to beta test?

    Besically, it should be possible to set a "beta switch" in the client. If true, the client will load the update right away, if false, the client will continue crunching on the old protein for a little longer - how long I don't know, maybe 12 hours or something?

    That would make it possible to report bugs and get them fixed before the majority of the clients is starting to update.

    It would also distribute the load on the server, at least a little bit

    Stupid idea or?
    Pointwood
    Jabber ID: pointwood@jabber.shd.dk
    irc.arstechnica.com, #distributed

  35. #35
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Down the road from Mr. Fist :D
    Posts
    76
    Originally posted by Brian the Fist
    We tested the auto-update and it worked fine for us. Anyone who did the auto-update should have received the correct native.val. If you did the auto-update and did not receive the correct native.val I cannot understand how at the moment.

    And yes, the 'fresh' packages had the incorrect file in them for a few hours, but we fixed it as soon as we learned of it. We do not explicitly try downloading the posted packages and running them prior to release (but rather just test our own local copies) which is how this packaging error was missed.
    All machines at my place were set to auto update from the Daemon I have up and running. They all puked for some reason. Either the wrong native file or for some reason it was unzipping and gave off an error and hung there (Windows machines only). All were coming from the same place. Looked in error logs and it said something about wrong size or something. Haven't bothered to open the 15MB error.log file from the update Daemon yet .... (I hope you fix that soon please! )


    Linux Machines went through ok.
    For the Windows machines I stopped each process and manually updated the neccesary files from the .zip I downloaded from the site. After that everything was on it's way.



    So far running this Daemon hasn't done me any good. Hopefully it will next time though


    (I'm not ranting or anything just in case someone gets the wrong idea about my post, hence the smilies in it)

  36. #36
    OCworkbench Stats Ho
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    519
    OK, what size is the Protein supposed to be ...56, 33 or 3.14
    I am not a Stats Ho, it is just more satisfying to see that my numbers are better than yours.

  37. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Oosterhout, Netherlands
    Posts
    223
    Proteine size is 56.
    Proud member of the Dutch Power Cows

  38. #38
    OCworkbench Stats Ho
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    519
    56 ehh, but I take it there is a good 56 and a bad 56
    I am not a Stats Ho, it is just more satisfying to see that my numbers are better than yours.

  39. #39
    Boinc'ing away
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    982
    Protein size = 56, Native.val size = 33Kb

  40. #40
    Originally posted by ^7_of_9
    Haven't bothered to open the 15MB error.log file from the update Daemon yet .... (I hope you fix that soon please! )
    I have a new version which you might want to try (not posted yet) that should remove the excessive logging I think. Let me know if you want me to send it to you.
    Howard Feldman

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •