Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: time to reduce the upload bandwidth requirements please

  1. #1
    Fixer of Broken Things FoBoT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Holden MO
    Posts
    2,137

    time to reduce the upload bandwidth requirements please

    for the "new people":

    way back when this project started, the amount of stuff uploaded to DF from the client was much, much larger than it is with today's "phase II" client.

    sometime during phase I (about half way through maybe?) , Howard was kind enough to make a change to just upload a portion of the data vs. the all of it to reduce the amount of upload bandwidth required.

    with this latest "fast" protein's massive data accumulation rate (my work lab is producing results faster than my upload bandwidth allows sending of the data) , I am asking for another change to the volume of DATA the client returns to help alleviate this problem


    please, howard, consider reducing the # of KB the client returns for each generation in some way to help us out

    DF is my #1 favorite DC project for many reasons and I would like to continue to keep the majority of my assets on DF , but i just don't have the upload bandwidth available during these "fast" protiens.

    thank you for your consideration.

    Use the right tool for the right job!

  2. #2
    Seconded.

    I'm racking up buffered generations at a frightening rate which has never happened before. Now maybe this is just temporary but at present, the machines are wasting time trying and failing to connect.

  3. #3
    Ol' retired IT geezer
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Scarborough
    Posts
    92
    I've used a dial-up line monitor to look at the bandwidth for both the current versus beta code for uploading. The beta code returns less than 2K of response versus the 38K plus of the current production code. So the beta should help. However, I suspect its not ready for prime time yet.

    It looks like the current protein is too fast for current server. I suggest that the project abandon this protein for a larger/ slower one in the interest in getting some meaningful results in the near future. The 58 protein can be revisited when the architecture has been revamped to cope.

    Ned

  4. #4
    Fixer of Broken Things FoBoT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Holden MO
    Posts
    2,137
    if the "beta" has a 95% reduction in the upload bandwidth requirements, then my request has already been granted

    that is what i get for being a moderate stats whore and not participating in the beta
    Use the right tool for the right job!

  5. #5
    The beta is not bogged down simply because there is a tiny number of users uploading data, as well as the fact that the beta protein still remains the slower one. The response size is not the bottleneck.
    Elena Garderman

  6. #6

    Re: time to reduce the upload bandwidth requirements please

    Originally posted by FoBoT

    ...

    please, howard, consider reducing the # of KB the client returns for each generation in some way to help us out

    DF is my #1 favorite DC project for many reasons and I would like to continue to keep the majority of my assets on DF , but i just don't have the upload bandwidth available during these "fast" protiens.

    thank you for your consideration.

    Unfortunately, we have already cut down the content of the uploads to bare bones. If we remove anything else, we will simply not have sufficient data to carry out analysis. I believe that people may still be flushing results and keeping the servers ultra busy. Clearly not everyone is having difficulty getting through, so it is just a matter of time. We cannot miraculously improve the hardware overnight, nor do we have such resources at the moment. We appreciate the patience you have shown so far, and you should be seeing the server loads levelling out fairly soon.
    Elena Garderman

  7. #7

    Re: Re: time to reduce the upload bandwidth requirements please

    Originally posted by Stardragon
    Unfortunately, we have already cut down the content of the uploads to bare bones. If we remove anything else, we will simply not have sufficient data to carry out analysis. I believe that people may still be flushing results and keeping the servers ultra busy. Clearly not everyone is having difficulty getting through, so it is just a matter of time. We cannot miraculously improve the hardware overnight, nor do we have such resources at the moment. We appreciate the patience you have shown so far, and you should be seeing the server loads levelling out fairly soon.
    me "keeps fingers crossed"
    -:Beyond:-


  8. #8
    Fixer of Broken Things FoBoT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Holden MO
    Posts
    2,137
    my concern isn't about the server sides ability to handle the influx of data , that isn't the aim of my post

    it is about the number of client PC's i can run on a single conection of XXX KBps upload speed (in the case of my main lab at work, it is 128KBps upload limited)

    thanks
    Use the right tool for the right job!

  9. #9
    Administrator PCZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Chertsey Surrey UK
    Posts
    2,428
    FoBot

    I am having a lot of trouble uploading but I am not short of bandwidth.
    The slow response of the upload servers is the problem.

    Can you monitor your bandwidth usage ?

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Kodiak, Alaska
    Posts
    432
    During Phase I, I remember that choosing the option of uploading every 10,000 structures made it upload once every two hours with one of the proteins .. on one of my machines.

    Even with the extremely long delays involved in uploading data, I've got a number of machines that are going through more than 250 gens a day.. even though it looked like it was spending half its time trying to upload. (One win98 machine had 220 cached generations after getting kicked off the internet after the client update..)

    Instead of uploading once every hour or two - we'll be uploading 10-20 times an hour now with a protein this easy to fold.

    If all this is because of handshaking - then perhaps combining the data for 10-20 gens into one file, performing the handshaking, upload the 1 file, then break it up and send us back 10-20 results - would help out. Either that or it would start straining the backend servers dealing with the processing of the data..
    www.thegenomecollective.com
    Borging.. it's not just an addiction. It's...

  11. #11
    Social Parasite
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Hill Country
    Posts
    94
    I'm racking up buffered generations at a frightening rate which has never happened before. Now maybe this is just temporary but at present, the machines are wasting time trying and failing to connect.
    I'm using dial-up to connect to the internet. I'm being forced to conclude that the DF servers are not adequate to support my participation with this protein.

    In the past 24 hours my single machine has accumulated 100+ generations. Meaning that the number of generations it built is over one hundred MORE than it managed to transmit to the servers.

    I'm being affected twice: (1) Often, when I dial the internet and start an upload to DF, the server does not have a connection available. The upload process times out. (2) When I *do* reach the server, and at least one generation has been uploaded, sooner or later the server is so slow that the upload process times out.

    From error.log:
    Fri Mar 19 04:14:47 2004 ERROR: [010.003] {taskapi.c, line 1218} [ReadServerResponse] Timeout waiting for response, got 0 chars.
    Fri Mar 19 04:16:48 2004 ERROR: [000.000] {foldtrajlite2.c, line 4933} Error during upload: NO RESPONSE FROM SERVER - WILL TRY AGAIN LATER

    I simply do not have the time or the patience to keep dialing many times a day, nor to keep restarting uploads which terminate when there are still filesets to be uploaded.

    mikus

  12. #12
    Fixer of Broken Things FoBoT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Holden MO
    Posts
    2,137
    Originally posted by PCZ

    Can you monitor your bandwidth usage ?
    not with my current setup

    i have a freesco (linux) box acting as the router, it is a floppy distro , so no nice monitoring tools

    i should switch it for a "real" router distro and do some monitoring to see where i really am sitting on upload volume

    in the past, when dumping offline boxen through this setup, i have not been able to get more than 2 million "points" in a single update on the stats regardless of how many boxen i was dumping through this line, i am currently running close/around that
    Use the right tool for the right job!

  13. #13
    Minister of Propaganda Fozzie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Bristol,UK
    Posts
    3,609

    Thumbs up I hear you brother mikus

    I'm on dial-up too and will probably scale right back until we get another slow protein as this "wait and see" policy is just ridiculous.

    Doesn't take an Einstein to know that this changeover would be the fiasco it has turned out to be.

    With the cow hordes onboard, and good on them too, our numbers swelled.

    With rumours being put about that this would be a fast protein all manner of stat hungry vultures have also tunred back to DF. Don't blame those either.

    The upshot, which was obvious to many of us, is that the servers didn't cope, and so far are still not coping.

    Looks like we have reached the saturation point for contributors.

    I hear there are many other deserving projects with superior backends

    Alas poor Borg, I knew it Horatio



    http://www.butlersurvey.com/

  14. #14
    Social Parasite
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Hill Country
    Posts
    94
    Originally posted by Mikus
    In the past 24 hours my single machine has accumulated 100+ generations. Meaning that the number of generations it built is over one hundred MORE than it managed to transmit to the servers.
    I take back what I said. Since my last post, things have changed so that once an upload process has begun, it has not timed out, but has continued until all available filesets had been uploaded. Meaning that now the generations I had accumulated in the meantime *have* been accepted by the FD servers.

    Thanks, mikus

  15. #15
    Stats God in Training Darkness Productions's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    The land of dp!
    Posts
    4,164

    Re: Re: time to reduce the upload bandwidth requirements please

    Originally posted by Stardragon
    We cannot miraculously improve the hardware overnight, nor do we have such resources at the moment. We appreciate the patience you have shown so far, and you should be seeing the server loads levelling out fairly soon.
    Care to list what you need/want? I'm sure someone around here might be able to help...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •