View Poll Results: How big is N?

Voters
22. You may not vote on this poll
  • 8.6M-12.4M (already checked once - double check revealed prime)

    0 0%
  • 12.4M-13.4M (smaller than M(13466917) --> M39?)

    0 0%
  • 13.4M-20.9M (smaller than M(20996011) --> M40?)

    5 22.73%
  • 20.9M-33.2M (biggest Mersenne prime found so far)

    14 63.64%
  • 33.2M+ (more than 10M digits)

    1 4.55%
  • no prime at all!

    2 9.09%
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Possibly 41th Mersenne prime found!

  1. #1
    Sieve it, baby!
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Potsdam, Germany
    Posts
    959

    Exclamation Possibly 41st known Mersenne Prime found!

    I'm not sure if everyone already knows:

    GIMPS reported that they have possibly discovered the 41st known Mersenne Prime.

    Now the big quiz:
    How big this number is?

    Hint: Divide n by 3.32 to get the number digits of that number.
    Last edited by Mystwalker; 05-16-2004 at 10:17 PM.

  2. #2
    it might not even be the 41st perhaps it is smaller than the last one they found although chances are ita gonna be around 6800000 digits maybe even over 10,00,000 I believe they have a few people testing in that range.
    Last edited by Keroberts1; 05-16-2004 at 09:54 PM.

  3. #3
    it says on the site that they have performed additional quick checks to confirm it is almost definatly a prime. What are these quick checks?

  4. #4
    Sieve it, baby!
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Potsdam, Germany
    Posts
    959
    Originally posted by Keroberts1
    it might not even be the 41st perhaps it is smaller than the last one they found although chances are ita gonna be around 6800000 digits maybe even over 10,00,000 I believe they have a few people testing in that range.
    Right, I forgot a "known" --> 41st known Mersenne Prime possibly found. --> Fixed it as good as I could.
    The current status of the project can be seen here . There seem to have already been approx. 10,000 tests of numbers with > 10,000,000 digits.

    it says on the site that they have performed additional quick checks to confirm it is almost definatly a prime. What are these quick checks?
    Looking if the number is odd or even?
    Seriously, I have no idea and am also interested into this topic...

  5. #5
    Originally posted by Keroberts1
    it says on the site that they have performed additional quick checks to confirm it is almost definatly a prime. What are these quick checks?
    http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpos...8&postcount=28

    In the above message George Woltman wrote
    BTW, it is a new prime. The user sent in his save file. I reran the final 15,000 iterations and prime95 rediscovered the prime. There is no known method for creating a bogus save file that falsely rediscovers the prime.
    Poohbah of the search for Odd Perfect Numbers
    http://OddPerfect.org

  6. #6
    hopefully they don't have a 10,000,000 digit prime. Maybe we could still beat them there.

  7. #7
    Senior Member wirthi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Pasching.AT.EU
    Posts
    820
    There is no known method for creating a bogus save file that falsely rediscovers the prime.
    I know there are strange people but why should someone try to fake a prime? Everybody knows the results are doublechecked. There is no sense in trying to fake.

  8. #8
    Moderator vjs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    ARS DC forum
    Posts
    1,331
    People we should all be very happy that they found another prime, are we not all gaining as a species?

    Also is there a possibility that this prime fits one of our potential primes?

    (2^p)-1 = prime number = k.2^n+1 (for one of our k,n pairs that we have not tested)

    Also another approach:

    We are currently testing k,n's that fit the form k.2^n+1 and our smallest prime could be of the form (4847, 5000000) or larger (assuming we didn't make a mistake earlier)which would be at least x digits long.

    So if there are primes that are larger than x digits long do we check those see if they fit a potential K,N pair? I think we should...

    Wouldn't it be very silly if used 4 years of project time to finally find a known prime.

    My understanding of the project is we don't really need to find the smallest prime that fits n for every k, just one prime that fits every k.

    Does anyone know???

    VJS

    Not sure if the math works here but don't you simply:

    (Take the prime number) +1 then divide by each k to see if it produces an interger number.....

    Comments

  9. #9
    Former QueueMaster Ken_g6[TA]'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    184
    Originally posted by vjs
    Also is there a possibility that this prime fits one of our potential primes?

    (2^p)-1 = prime number = k.2^n+1 (for one of our k,n pairs that we have not tested)

    Also another approach:

    We are currently testing k,n's that fit the form k.2^n+1 and our smallest prime could be of the form (4847, 5000000) or larger (assuming we didn't make a mistake earlier)which would be at least x digits long.

    So if there are primes that are larger than x digits long do we check those see if they fit a potential K,N pair? I think we should...

    Wouldn't it be very silly if used 4 years of project time to finally find a known prime.

    My understanding of the project is we don't really need to find the smallest prime that fits n for every k, just one prime that fits every k.

    Does anyone know???

    VJS

    Not sure if the math works here but don't you simply:

    (Take the prime number) +1 then divide by each k to see if it produces an interger number.....

    Comments
    In binary, numbers of the two forms look very different. 2^p-1 is a binary repunit:

    11111111...1111111

    whereas k*2^n+1 is
    K (xxxx) *2^n (10000...0000) +1, or

    xxxx0000...0001

    They would only match up when k=2^(p-1)-1 and n=1.
    Proud member of the friendliest team around, Team Anandtech!
    The Queue is dead! (Or not needed.) Long Live George Woltman!

  10. #10
    thye've confirmed it its 7,235,733 digits. Thye sure are getting close to the 10,000,000 mark. Guess they'll be past the boundary in about a year and a half. Probably find one wihtin two and a half years.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •