Some more suggestions Mike, If it's still a work in progress ...

1. Why don't you change the p<3T and P>3T to P<500T and P>500T

And possibly including the old factors without score not sure...
At least this way it will show how much work was done in the past for reference purposes.

2. I'd also suggest changing the 3m reference to 8m (Roughly current prp), how many new users really understand why 3m? (I.E. old dual range effort)

3. Also thanks for the forsite of including n>20m

4. Also is it possible to include team affilations?




Regardless just some suggestions that I'm sure will come up...

Thanks for all your great work last year it was really appreciated.