New additions

[Jeff17]

OK if I have figured out Vaios correctly, then 4 is important? If not then it is freaky that my theory worked when tested on five people's stats.

[AMDave]

Hehe.
4 sure is a freaky number, but it's not important to the 'vaio' in any other way than: If I focus hard for a week or two I can probable get 4 more of them
But you are REEEALLY really close!
Try out your hypothesis on a few more random participants on the list of vaios.
You'll see what I mean.

[Bok]

I half randomly used <5 as the criteria, but I might actually make it =1 instead. ?

[AMDave]

@Jeff17:
Oopz. I thought it was <=5, but <5 makes you SPOT ON and me a member of the City Water Recyling Plant (aka - a crap analyst :P )

[gopher_yarrowzoo]

I'll just go back to my stats tweaking... or something...

[Chuck]

Goph,
After you get the local time display tweaked, you want to have fun with me when we give them '6' and '9' to figure out and not just 4 ???????

C.

[gopher_yarrowzoo]

Goph,
After you get the local time display tweaked, you want to have fun with me when we give them '6' and '9' to figure out and not just 4 ???????

C.

It's fixed I think...