It may be too late and I'm not the one that care a lot about this, but I bring this up because there lately have been some talk about the stats and the fact that they gives a big advantage to the older teams/participants.
The reason is that the older teams have been making "easy points" when crunching the former, faster proteins. People just joining now will have a really hard time climbing up the stats considering how slow this new protein is compared to the previous proteins.
Yes, I know it's the science that matters here, especially now with the CASP5 competition, but let's face it: For a lot of participants in projects like this, it's the stats that really matters, that's what motivates them. The fact that the stats system isn't fair, can easily make people angry and make them prefer another project (and there are lots of them today...).
As I said, I don't know whether it is something that should be done anything about (optimally it should have been decided when the project started) or even if it is at all possible to create some kind of system that makes it more fair. Something like if the new protein is 3 times slower than the last one, then each generated structure should count as 3x in the stats.
I believe it would be a good thing to discuss this now instead of later. Maybe the answer is that it is not possible but then we at least know that and the reasons why, when new participants asks about it.
EDIT: I moved this to a new thread instead if hijacking an existing one.