jasong
02-10-2006, 08:58 PM
Even when you're away from second-pass, your scoring method is still unfair and inaccurate.
May I please recommend that you take a good look at Riesel Sieve's scoring method for LLRing?:
7.5^(ln(n/524288))*100
While your amount of work for an n value for prp may be different from the amount of work for LLRing the same n-value, I'm sure some intelligent person could adjust the equation to work for prp.
Please seriously consider the possibility of using this formula or and adjusted version of it.
May I please recommend that you take a good look at Riesel Sieve's scoring method for LLRing?:
7.5^(ln(n/524288))*100
While your amount of work for an n value for prp may be different from the amount of work for LLRing the same n-value, I'm sure some intelligent person could adjust the equation to work for prp.
Please seriously consider the possibility of using this formula or and adjusted version of it.